| Home | Books | National Directory | Position Papers | Alan’s Blog | FAQ | New Stuff | Search |
 PAGE NINE No. 177 "The
Uninvited Ombudsman Report" om•buds•man, n. a public advocate with a significant
degree of independence, representing the
interests of the public, addressing
maladministration or a violation of
rights; previously but no
longer employed by American news
media since the turn of the
21st century. And it shows. April 25, 2018 CONTENTS The titles should be links, that tech isn't working, sorry. Search the story number with a hyphen (e.g., 3- ) that works. Or just scroll. 1- FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP PLANS OUTLINED Congress Goes Along, see the subject-ban list 2- "RED FLAG" LAWS: Extreme Danger Identify and poke people ready to kill -- then turn them loose? "People too dangerous to keep their own guns are too dangerous to be roaming around." ...with knives, vehicles, chainsaws, gasoline... other guns... how is this safe? Driven by gun-fear, another left-wing disarmament travesty, hoplophobic, worse than pretend gun-free zones where the mass murders take place. 3- HOW TO BAN THE AR-15 The children's march insists on it. We asked them -- they don't know what it is, or why they want it done. 4- No Immediate Response Media hubris is unabated White House failure to step-n-fetch-it upsets reporters At least the subject was dumb -- Hillary cheated on Bernie 5- FAKE-NEWS POLICE Report For Duty Reason to be optimistic, good guys coming on scene  "His hands are bound." -Reuters Even seeing isn't believing. 6- WIKIPEDIA CENSORS "GUN RIGHTS" The term "gun politics" has replaced "gun rights" Spotted by accident -- affects NRA, SAF, GOA, JPFO, more Proof is in Wiki archive  FULL SIZE IMAGE AND LINKS WITH THE STORY BELOW 7- Industry Grows Media snoozes This much growth anywhere else would be a headline Reporters are embarrassed, could be proud • Better than average reader remarks (at end) New: KORWIN'S CLOSING COMMENTARY ----::::---- MEET ME AT (Upcoming Appearances) Scroll down Winner of the
Defender of Liberty Award, 2017  -- Tell your friends -- Permission to circulate granted. ...and encouraged. Page Nine on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pageninewatchblog Gun Laws dot com on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gunlawsdotcom TrainMeAZ on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TrainMeAZ    Alan on YouTube (COOL!) -- https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=alan+korwin+gunlaws.com ----::::---- STARTERS Only U.S. Citizens should vote in
U.S. elections. -- -- -- Note
to NSSF and the Industry: “Assault is a kind of behavior, not a kind of hardware.” Help take away this powerful linguistic trick from the left. The gun bans using the so-called "assault weapon" moniker are banning everything, read them! They ban anything with a grip. Keep pointing that out. “Oh, that law! The one that bans anything with a grip. You’ve been deceived. They’re assaulting your senses.” Let them argue uphill that it's more complicated than that. It's not much more complicated. They're targeting guns with a grip. Not AR-15s. Send them to Page Nine, bill language is linked below. -- BLOCKBUSTER: Millions of defensive gun
uses every year. A federal Centers
for Disease Control study found In fact, it was three separate studies, each
one suppressed. -- Adam Smith recognized that private property, free trade, self-interest, limited government and division of labor were the basics of capitalism and cornerstones of personal freedom and economic security. (The American Way) -- Robert MacNamee, a now
fabulously wealthy early Facebook investor, is now concerned with iPhone
addiction, and plans by the big players to increase dependency and
phone use by kids, teens, and business models built on increasing customer
use and dependency. Colors, bait, music, linkages, user recognition, AI,
geo tracking, location dependent ads... Google this, if you want to lose
sleep. Youngsters are at 95 phone views average per hour and rising. Last
thing you see before the pillow, first thing when eyes open... -- SAME GREAT STUFF, JUST LESS
MONEY
 Stop Teaching Our Kids to Kill
Lt. Col. Grossman, a scholar, soldier, speaker, one of
the
world’s foremost experts on human aggression, issues this call to
action
to parents, teachers, citizens and you. He trains soldiers to kill,
to overcome their inhibitions, and
sees the same impassionate techniques aimed at our kids, with
predictable results. Kids never used to commit mass murder.
We’re encouraging psychotic behavior, teaching the
mechanics, getting sick results. Read the science, digest the research,
get tools to fight back. All the evidence and sound argument you need to
prove what we have all suspected. Child mass murderers are being developed
and encouraged, created, not born. The culprits are known, along with the
methods. The horrible results must be stopped. It's not about the
guns. ----::::---- 1- Facebook Censorship
Plans Announced Congress Goes Along Zuckerberg must be thinking, ‘You are SO over!’ The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: Opinions on Mark Zuckerberg’s recent marathon inquisition before Congress are all over the map. Search it online if you haven’t already, or care. Members of Congress showed themselves to be highly ignorant, illiterate and uninformed about the Internet, Facebook, data collection on individuals -- even how online tools work. Most of their questions didn’t rise to the level of grade-school children -- and the members didn’t know it. Chairman Grassley struggled so hard to read his own statement he is an embarrassment to Congress itself, completely hard to listen to his broken cadence and stumbling. Zuckerberg didn’t get frazzled, or smirk, or get really hard questions, and his answers, after a few hours and certainly by the second day, were simple repetition of prepared statements, delivered from memory, showing his incredible intellectual prowess, typical of the other few oligarchs of internet machinery. His left-wing predilection was self-evident, and problems this presents for the nation are stunning. His support for dark-money funded ignorant children in the March for our Lives media-promoted movement was revealing. Congress has no way to contain him, or the web’s power that challenges their own, though some suggestions did arise: An “honest ads act,” fake-account removal, state-actor identification, better advertiser ID, and third-party fact checkers from the Poynter Institute, each with their own merits and disastrous side effects and downsides were proposed. Stay tuned. The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: Facebook censorship will cover three areas. No one raised objections, they all fell in line with Zuckerberg’s default position: TOPICS TO BE FACEBOOK
CENSORED: Hate Speech Violence Terrorism Yes, these are broad, easily abused categories. Good definitions of these don’t exist. Everyone agreed on that. But it didn’t deter Congress or Facebook. Ask Dennis Prager if decent educational material is already being wiped out, with those excuses as excuses. It is. Because people have an impossible time defining these, automated “artificial intelligence” programs will do much of the work for us. Soon. People can’t define language to be banned, so machines will. We can count on these to do a good job. Plus, there is so much of this on Facebook, people would never have enough time to do the work. A method for appeals was not addressed. Yes, that all scares me too. If this was Revolutionary times (some people say these are), Thomas Jefferson and the rest of the Founders would not be able to speak in the largest public square in the nation (and world). Hate speech is an abomination, according to The Uninvited Ombudsman. It exists solely in the eye of the beholder. Anything you like, that someone else hates, is hate speech, according to leading experts. Leftists hate everything the moderates and the right say, so goodbye free speech on those grounds alone. Free speech, to the hard left, is no longer valid, according to experts familiar with the situation. Violence, not to be tolerated, describes much of what government does, experts say. Common wisdom notes that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. It has been reported that just calling them men is hate speech to leftists. Microaggression is a new leftist term for hate speech in small doses, or that you can't see, but they can, sources report. And this is what Zuckerberg and his left-wing allies, with the blessing of Congress, have decided is OK to control. The Founding Fathers could not be immediately reached for comment. So far, memos like this one are free from censorship. But search for it on the web, and it will get tougher and tougher to find, experts say. With Wikipedia censoring the term “gun rights” (see separate article, item 6) that process is already well under way. We did learn from the hearings that the algorithms that do the searching are only partially skewed to prevent locating anything that isn’t of democrat, left-leaning origin. It will only get worse, according to leading experts. SIDEBAR During the hearings: Facebook is being accused of advancing genocide of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, a 95% Buddhist country, where the Muslims are charged with, or suspected of, creating trouble. Therefor, they are being murdered by local police and military, and are fleeing persecution by the hundreds of thousands into neighboring Bangladesh. Hate speech against the Muslims on Facebook is credited with instigating much of the violence, but this is a controversial charge, unpopular with Zuckerberg. http://www.atimes.com/article/facebook-contributing-genocide-myanmar/ A widely distributed photo provided by
Reuters carries this
caption:  "Ten Rohingya Muslim men with their hands bound kneel in Inn Din village, the site of a mass grave, on September 1, 2017. Photo: Handout via Reuters" The photo is then matched up with bodies in a mass grave, with arrows matching the kneeling men to the bodies in the grave. Easy to find with a search. The match up photo may or may not be true, Page Nine makes no claim there. However, enlargement of this photo clearly shows the caption “hands bound” is false --  Make of this what you will. The caption is not accurate. This is not to say the genocide and other atrocities are not true. It just points out the media does a lousy job of protecting its credibility. No one in the chain of command at Reuters could tell the caption is false. Media earns the derogatory titles it gets. ----::::---- Traveler's Guide 2018 Is In
Stock! Immediate
Delivery Complete overhaul -- lots of new features and information!! If you haven't
gotten one in a while, now is the
time.  The 2018 "Traveler's Guide"
IS IN STOCK! "The Traveler's Guide to the Firearm Laws of the Fifty States" by J. Scott Kappas, Esq. Only
$14.95 -- New for 2018!   ORDER TWO
COPIES -- One for home, one for vehicle! Only $29.90 + S&H! Give one to a friend or family member -- keep them safe too. Wholesale Discounts! List Price $14.95 each, your wholesale cost $10.95 each, minimum order is 12 ($131.40 +S&H) The gun laws don't remain the same! States have changed their gun laws. EVERY STATE WITH NEW TRAVEL LAWS IS UPDATED All previous year's changes are included, and listed. The book now includes restaurant carry and police roadside stops too! How to handle illegal requests for
searches. Updated freedom chart -- how did your
state do? EXPANDED -- Hotels and
Lodging Motorcycles Colleges and K-12 School Grounds Loaded v. Unloaded Open Carry v.
Concealed Carry Constitutional
Carry Travel through restricted
states Traffic stops National Parks and Indian Reservations Air, Cruise Ships, Trains and Buses Commercial Trucks Preemption Non-permittees State-by-State rules "It doesn't make sense to own a gun and not know the rules." Click here to order NOW! http://gunlaws.com/travel.htm Only $14.95 -- New for 2018! ----::::----  UPCOMING APPEARANCES -- MEET ME AT: The
Patriots Dinner
928-303-3641 District 1 Director 928-530-3637 MCRCC Chairman ----::::---- CHICAGO: Alternative Mass Media Convention AMM-Con 2018 The Polite Society Podcast and Self-Defense Radio Network, with the Second Amendment Foundation at the Gun Rights Policy Conference Friday, Sep. 20, 2018 Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, IL ----::::---- Gun Rights Policy Conference Sep. 21-23, 2018, Chicago ----::::---- JPFO Annual Roundtable at GRPC, 2018  Join JPFO to keep up with activities. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, http://www.jpfo.org "Speaks with the moral authority of an oppressed
minority." ----::::---- Enacted in 6 states, tantrums driving others to
act 2- "Red Flag" Laws Reduce
Safety Identify and enrage people ready to kill. Then set them loose? Take their guns, but leave them everything else, and free. What crazy victim feels safer like that? The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: USA Today Editorial, a few positive points: Red-flag laws let police confiscate guns without due process. Suspending the Constitution in a secret hearing is a point from which there is no return. To listen to the media's anti-rights drumbeat, no one does -- or could -- oppose the concept of stripping Americans of their constitutional rights in secret proceedings where they have no voice. But this is exactly what is at stake with Gun Confiscation Orders -- cynically disguised as "red flag laws." Six states have enacted these laws. At their core, they allow the police to convene a Kafkaesque secret proceeding, in which an American can be stripped of gun rights and Fourth Amendment rights, even though gun owners are barred from participating in the hearings or arguing their side of the dispute. --Michael Hammond, opinion writer, USA Today https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/04/19/red-flag-laws-strip-gun-rights-violate-constitution-column/526221002/ Support from the “news” section: Red Flag Laws Gain Momentum In States -- USA Today, Washington -- States across the country are taking a closer look at “red flag” laws... The laws allow family members or law enforcement to seek a court order to temporarily restrict people's access to firearms when they show "red flags" that they are a danger to themselves or others. Florida became the sixth state to pass a red-flag law, and other state lawmakers introduced a flurry of new bills, including first-time legislation in more than a handful of states, according to Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun control advocacy group. Bills are now pending in 22 states and the District of Columbia, while bipartisan efforts are coming together in Congress ... getting more attention now as students protest legislative inaction on gun violence... “those bills across the country are taking on renewed significance... What can we do to make sure this doesn’t happen here?” according to a gun-control spokesperson. Though supporters say the bills can prevent tragedies, critics say they have the potential to deprive gun owners of due process and their Second Amendment rights. “gun violence restraining order” or “extreme risk protection order” to temporarily restrict a person’s access to firearms. The judge can issue an emergency, temporary order -- without the gun owner being present -- to prevent immediate danger. But a full hearing must be scheduled quickly, offering the gun owner the ability to respond. The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: RED FLAG LAWS ARE SUBTLE BUT SEDUCTIVE SCAM Little more than another left-wing
expression of gun fear, and a typically dangerous, reckless, negligent idea. “A person too
dangerous to touch
guns is too dangerous to be walking around.” The only reason this law is being floated is to provide another avenue for the anti-rights advocates to restrict gun possession. And to quiet the tantrum being thrown by children nationally. It is not a rational approach to a problem that already has solutions available, and unused. People who want guns to “just go away,” irrationally believing this red-flagging power will somehow increase safety. They see this type of law as a saving grace, when in fact it does harm. By identifying seriously dangerous individuals and setting these ticking time bombs free it is actually counterproductive. The notion that it is about public safety is as untrue as other left-wing anti-weapon myths the public has been forced to endure: armed pilots shooting down their own planes (delaying that program for years); invisible guns, which almost banned the Glock (the best choice for police forces nationwide); carry-permit shootout fears (predicted for every state but in the end pure fantasy); it’s a long list of deceptions with which the public has been burdened. Who can even remember back to Saturday night specials or cooling off periods that leave maniacs armed forever -- after five days. Red-flag laws seek to leave extremely dangerous people out loose after they are identified. This virtually defines insanity. The counter argument is that they're not really that dangerous. Then how to justify the taking of property and denial of rights without trial in secret. The only thing going for this law, in the minds of its creators, is it creates a new category of prohibited people. Gunlessness is a holy grail they pursue so tenaciously defies logic and reason -- now for people so dangerous they really should not be allowed matches and gasoline, anything available at Home Depot, motor vehicles -- in short, they cannot be allowed out into the public until they are “cured,” however these absurd red-flag laws define that. Who would ever risk restoring the rights of someone stigmatized by a red-flag designation is unclear. The coincidence between red flags and communism is just coincidence, according to leading experts. Red Flag bills, separate problem “Then, of course, there is the problem of so-called "gun-free zones," of which the schools where our children spend much of their day are the largest and most obvious. How many times does a lunatic with a gun have to show up in one of these so-called "gun-free zones" before we grasp the fact that they are not "gun free" at all? “The only people free of guns are the people getting killed trying to protect our children from psychopaths. Despite the protests of those ostensibly on the side of disarming everyone, you will note that every time one of these armed lunatics has arrived and started killing, the inevitable response of the gun deniers has been to call people with guns to come and handle the problem. “Do we fail to understand the simple reality that having people with guns already there, and ready to respond when the event takes place, is a better option? Do we fail to understand that pretending a place is a "gun-free zone" when it so clearly is not, only results in the deaths of innocents, while also telling psychopaths where the easy targets are?” --Dave Kopp, President, AzCDL ----::::----  CALIFORNIA GUN
LAWSby C.D. Michel, with Joseph A.
Silvoso, III
Only $29.99 +S&H -- Order yours now California may be the most dangerous state in which to
own a gun. Government rules are so restrictive, they may pose a greater risk to you than criminal encounters. Get this book to help ensure your safety. Yes, this is a deplorable state of affairs. And yes, this is an excellent book, done with charts, photos, images and techniques that make it easy. ----::::---- 3- No Immediate Response
Media Hubris Goes Unabated The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: “The White House and Trump campaign officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.” -- USA Today, April 21, 2018 --Nicole Guadiano, Fredreka Schouten The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: “The White House and Trump campaign officials did not immediately respond to any of dozens of requests for comment today, on scores of topics.” --Korwin The audacity of USA Today reporters, and “news” media elsewhere for commonly using this bombastic, antagonistic and pejorative expression, when they don’t get what they want. “The news media acts like they’re entitled to go behind police lines.” -Ted Parod. The notion that the president of the free world is required or somehow obligated to respond at all, let alone immediately, to any request from me, or you, or an outfit with a reputation like USA Today reflects a level of hubris that calls for remedial behavior camp. That professionals in an organization behave this way would be grounds for serious reprimand, if not dismissal, considering the status of the people being insulted. They could have their licenses revoked, except they are unlicensed operators. The lunatic fringe nature in this particular case is hysterical. USA Today seeks an immediate response to the charge that Russian hacking revealed Hillary is indeed crooked, and with the democrat party illegally colluded to defeat -- Bernie Sanders! He apparently had a chance of getting the nomination for president away from Hillary. Democrats are suing, saying Hillary’s illegal activity, once it was revealed, hurt her, even though Trump had nothing to do with the dems shenanigans against one of their own. “A request was made to Trump officials for comment at 10 a.m. today,” might be a reasonable line. Expecting a reply beyond sarcasm unbecoming a president? Fuggedaboudit. A reply would from the White House would be as unreasonable as the lawsuit if you think about it. ----::::---- "I can't recommend After You Shoot highly
enough!" Order TWO and we pay your shipping!
Save $5! According to criminal-defense attorneys, half of all convictions for self-defense incidents rely on frantic traumatized 911 tapes. Dispatchers are trained to get statements from you, keep you on the line. As a bonus, the media will air your voice nationwide for weeks. That can’t be right. Stay safe. Get the book. Thank you for your support. 4-
Fake-News Police
Report for Duty “NewsGuard” = A Free Market Solution to Wild Web Nutrition Labels for news outlets The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: --The Wall Street Journal, March 3, 2018: “The Internet broke down barriers by enabling everyone to become a publisher. The unintended consequence was the fake-news epidemic. Teenagers in Macedonia discovered they could make a small fortune from online advertising by concocting outlandish click-bait stories... Russia Today is now RT.com... ‘I saw the news on Facebook’... easy for purveyors of knowingly false news or propaganda to fool users by looking like legitimate publishers...” The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: Perhaps worse, CNN has become a non-stop conspiracy-theory provider, and opinion spinner, with a thin veil of newsiness and a motto, “the most trusted name in news.” Basically no one believes that anymore, despite the deep baritone that delivers the line. MSNBC essentially makes no pretense that they are anything but a campaign outlet for leftist ideology and democrats, and a hostile belligerent aimed at all non-democrats, even the Bernies who are further left (socialist) than they are. So -- L. Gordon Crovitz, the former publisher at The Wall Street Journal is teaming up with Steve Brill, the legendary journalist and editor who founded Brill’s Content, to launch NewsGuard. This online news-media watchdog will establish “nutrition labels” for so-called news outlets to establish the bona fides of major news “brands” and help the news-consuming public tell what’s what, with Red, Yellow and Green color coding. The team plans to use journalistically trained analysts, also known as human beings, instead of algorithms and other forms of computer automation, to rate news brands, depending on whether they produce real journalism, disclose their underlying interests, or intentionally purvey fake news. The team expects to cover 7,500 online outlets, about 98% of what passes for news, they say. Judging from what I’ve seen of Brill’s previous work, this could be splendid. A “white list” of outlets that advertisers can rely on is part of the plan. Commercial groups have been hit hard, promoting their goods on sites that turn out to be biased spreaders of tripe. Reviews of the reviewers will include pros and the public, part of a robust transparency effort. Problems might arise, since the glowing description is provided by Crovitz, in The Wall Street Journal, but one can hope. ----::::----  Plus five more! THE FOUNDERS PACKAGE "The Books That Gave America Its
Start"
This is what the Founding Fathers read -- and wrote! Now you can get America's
most essential books -- You hear about these
all the time, Just a few easy clicks for a superb addition to your library A SUPERB GIFT SET!
Complete 11 book
set ----::::---- 5- How to Ban the AR-15
The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: Many times over: No one needs an AR-15. All we want to do is ban the AR-15. It’s a weapon of war. It’s a killing machine. It has no place on our streets. The Founders never could have imagined any such thing in the hands of the public. It’s too dangerous for the public to own. The magazine is too large. The bullets can be fired too quickly. It’s scary looking. You don’t need it to hunt ducks. It doesn’t matter if police have them. The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: Having listed those familiar complaints, I’ll answer them just as fast: Property ownership in this country isn’t based on need (and you don’t get to decide someone else’s need, that’s the communist model). All we want is to have the finest rifle made. It’s a weapon of peace. It’s a self-defense firearm. It’s perfect for the public. The Founders never could have imagined throwing your voice further than you can speak either. It’s too dangerous for the government to be sole owners. Insufficient ammo supply can be lethal. Slow-firing guns are dangerous. Scary is in the eye of the beholder, you might need treatment. Preferences for hunting are personal, immaterial here, not your concern and disconnected from the right to keep and bear arms. Police have them for the exact same reasons we want them. OK, so much for that. Banning the AR-15, America’s Rifle, as media-promoted child “survivors” are trying to force upon this great nation, is not only a bad idea, it’s illegal -- infringement -- and as a practical matter, it’s hard. You can’t ban guns by name, people will just change the name, that doesn’t work. You can describe guns, but people just modify the designs so they don’t fit the description. That’s been tried, it was a failure. There’s too many manufacturers, that cat’s out of the bag, along with the engineering plans, so you can’t close down the plants. If you do somehow outlaw manufacture what do you do about the millions of guns people own? Confiscation is the answer, among the most heinous government crimes there are, illegal a dozen different ways, and incendiary to the public. The rule of law has to be abandoned for that one. When government doesn't or can't enforce the law, the militia gets called up. Buying the guns back, an idea sometimes mentioned, runs up against the treasury hasn’t got the funds, and no votes in favor. Buying from unwilling sellers is confiscation again, disguised with ribbon and bow. All of the drastic ideas like this tempt armed rebellion, literally, from the very people whose guns you want to take, so you must tread lightly there. Will police and soldiers shoot at Americans defending their firearms? Do you really want to push things that far? That’s not much of a plan. Note, all the bans so far haven’t disarmed inner cities, where murderers murder 6,000 victims a year, with virtually no murder trials. Guns get smuggled into this country like drugs, women and “undocumented migrant workers and repeat offenders,” so that side of an AR-15 ban is not exactly airtight. So what did they (that’s the democrat party, the one with no demonstrated respect for the right to keep and bear arms) do to ban the AR-15, when they drafted their bill? The bill the marching children, referred to as ignorant useful idiots by some leading experts, what did that bill propose? They banned every rifle, pistol and shotgun that takes a magazine of any size, and has a grip. https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/f/d/fdca734c-4855-49f3-aa1d-2ed02e791d6d/E5ECBD1B1D722D5C4AEDAEBB6276AB36.awb-bill-text.pdf Most but not all pistols will escape the law under the “two-grip” rule. In the past though, BATFE, the agency responsible for enforcing these things, has been known to fabricate their own parts to “prove” a firearm was subject to enforcement. The AR-15 Ban, edited for pertinent part: (36) The term ‘semiautomatic assault weapon’ means any of the following: (A) A semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any 1 of the following: (i) A pistol grip. (D) A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any 1 of the following: (ii) A second pistol grip. (F) A semiautomatic shotgun that has any 1 of the following: (ii) A pistol grip. (39) The term ‘detachable magazine’ means an ammunition feeding device that can be removed from a firearm without disassembly of the firearm action.* (46) The term ‘pistol grip’ means a grip, a thumb-hole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip. *Editor’s note: Any capacity magazine is included. It’s safe to say every mass media report on the move to ban the AR-15, or assault weapons, has been fake, phony or wrong, based on the bill. ----::::----  DANCING IN BLOOD Exposing the Gun-Ban Lobby's Playbook to Destroy Your Rights by Alan Gottlieb and Dave Workman 184 pgs. $15.00 If you want to know precisely how the anti-rights lobby and their advocates against freedom are attacking our rights, get this book. You'll have a behind the scenes, insightful view of what they're doing, how they operate, and be better prepared to stop them in their tracks. Easy reading, fact filled, with case after case described, this a road map for gun-rights supporters. It will give you ideas you can apply. ----::::---- See me:  http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/23/korwin-its-not-about-the-shootings-its-about-murder/ ----::::---- 6- Wikipedia Censors “Gun Rights” References to gun rights are redirected to politics Propaganda is now "Wikiganda" The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: Nothing. The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: Thanks to the observant work of an internet-presence guru, we now know you can’t find “Gun Rights” on Wikipedia. It’s as if such a thing doesn’t exist. Internal references to "gun rights" are redirected, some very recently, indicating this is an ongoing effort. Admittedly, there is a bizarre argument that guns don’t have rights, only people have rights, but that is specious here. As a term of art, “gun rights” accounts for limitations in the English language, everyone gets that. "Gun rights" is a synonym for the right to keep and bear arms, and everything that encompasses, along with a dozen other ways of expressing the same thing. For Wikipedia, gun rights is “gun politics.” These are not the same of course. Look up politics, look up rights, that case rests on its own. Even worse than the blatant censorship of "gun rights" is the fact that Wikipedia is doing it. What else has fallen under this censorship axe? The web guru observes: “Just read the ‘gun politics’ page and look how it presents a unique perspective on guns, gun rights, and so-called "gun control," all in the name of gun politics. "For example, here's the last paragraph in the opening of the 'gun politics history' section: "Closely related to the militia tradition is the frontier tradition, with the need for self-protection pursuant to westward expansion and the extension of the American frontier. Though it has not been a necessary part of daily survival for over a century, ‘generations of Americans continued to embrace and glorify it as a living inheritance -- as a permanent ingredient of this nation's style and culture’.” By redirecting a reference to “gun rights” to a slanted “gun politics” opinion piece, the so-called "gun-control" side is working within Wikipedia to promote the gun-confiscation agenda. One of its latest strategies is this redirect. It is an extremely clever Orwellian methodology. In another maneuver, even though the opening line describing the Second Amendment Foundation retains the censored phrase "gun rights" and says the group supports gun rights, (it would not work to say they support gun politics, indicating this is not an automated global replacement) someone recently (Feb. 13, 2018) redirected (hijacked) the "gun rights" link and redirected it to "gun politics," as if SAF supports gun politics, as Wiki describes it. The Wiki history architecture captures the deed: NOTE: What Wikipedia has done in these cases is link the organization’s statements about defense of gun rights to a blurb and pages about gun politics. The idea of a civil and human right to firearms, is absent. The fundamental civil and human right to arms that the American people possess is now missing in the descriptions. No page for Gun Rights exists at Wikipedia. The "world’s encyclopedia," now coincidentally managed by a left-leaning cabal of techno-oligrarchs, is starting to show its treachery. See for yourself: SAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_Foundation NRA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association GOA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Owners_of_America JPFO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_for_the_Preservation_of_Firearms_Ownership They have all had their "gun
rights" references redirected to "Gun politics"
--  The Uninvited Ombudsman is now looking into developing an entry on "Gun Rights" for publication in Wikipedia, and will be working with the nation's leading experts on this important task. ----::::---- Here's how you support my work -- THE ALAN PACKAGE!  SAVE! Click the image for other packages too. If you appreciate Alan Korwin’s
efforts, Available separately too: The groundbreaking After You Shoot (so you don’t help convict yourself) Gun Laws of America (the unabridged guide to every federal gun law) The Heller Case (the lawsuit that saved the 2nd Amendment) Supreme Court Gun Cases (92 cases with descriptions on searchable CD) Bomb Jokes at Airports (help save free speech) And his latest, designed to bring your gunless friends on board -- Your First Gun: Should You Buy One and Join 60 Million Safely Armed American Homes? A smokin’ deal! Plus! 100 Guns Save Lives heart stickers in the package for you. GREAT
SAVINGS $107.75 if
purchased separately -- but only $69.95 for the set -- Save $37.80!
Cheap, works wonders, changes hearts and minds. $10 bucks each, 4
for $20. Do something.
Only
$20 for a 4-Pack so you can give 'em away! Immediate delivery on Kindle, only $4.95! See my company's entire line of fine products: All our books, DVDs and
other goods are listed here by category and alphabetically 7-
Business Booms,
Media Silent Bigotry makes them feel shame, Americans feel pride The lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told you: One industry grew, one shrank, the stock market blah blah... The results of an economic study by some industry trade group somewhere shows that things are good, things are bad, things are. Media typically reports on changes and events in business, because business is good, we all need work. The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: Virtually unreported in the lamestream, despite its undivided firearm attention for weeks on a single act of unspeakable horror by a psychotic maniac, the firearms industry is in good health and growing. In other news, ethnic murders in inner cities remained stable at about 6,000 per year, with no trials reported, if any, on national news. Police issued no statements. 310,000 jobs The total economic impact of the firearms and ammunition industry in the United States increased from $19.1 billion in 2008 to $51.4 billion in 2017, a 169 percent increase, while the total number of full-time equivalent jobs rose from approximately 166,000 to almost 310,000, an 87 percent increase in that period, according to the annual report released this week by NSSF. On a year-over-year basis, the industry’s economic impact rose from $51.3 billion in 2016 to $51.4 in 2017, ticking higher even while the industry came off peak production years. ----::::---- CLOSEOUTS AND SALES Get our good stuff cheap. Clearance items. Some one-of-a-kind, first come gets it. https://www.gunlaws.com/Closeouts-For-Sale.htm ----::::---- Where
are YOU from? 
Illustrated, with national
rankings 368 pages, only $19.95 ----::::---- Bloomfield Press is always adding products -- including some classics! For a good time... click this link: https://www.gunlaws.com/books21Newest.htm  50-state Knife-Law guide! (AT LAST! And fascinating too.)   50-state Self-Defense-Law guides! (Two of them actually, one easy, one deep) DO YOU HUNT? Stunning new analysis of HUNTING ACCIDENTS Did you know how hunting accidents REALLY happen? Two hunting buddies noticed reports were borderline fake, dug deeper, great insights New political NOVELS New guides for WOMEN PLUS Guides to YOUR State gun laws ("It doesn't make sense to own a gun and not know the rules")  See more, click the image. https://www.gunlaws.com/books.htm  GEORGIA!
In Stock!
ILLINOIS, MINNESOTA, WISCONSIN! Get yours! https://www.gunlaws.com/books2.htm How to BE MORE EFFECTIVE politically (Stop complaining and learn how to do something) Get Yourself a Button -- and more!  https://www.gunlaws.com/books11buttons.htm ----::::---- by Alan Korwin  The Arizona Gun Owner's Guide https://www.gunlaws.com/agog.htm  The Texas Gun Owner's Guide https://www.gunlaws.com/tgog.htm Get a handle on your federal laws:  Gun Laws of America https://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm Unabridged, only $20 bucks. Come back here when you're done reading the Page Nine news! ----::::----  Tempus Fugit ("Time Flies") Lawrence Lee Rowe, Jr., 310 p., $20, Hardcover https://www.gunlaws.com/books7novels.htm Out of print, we just got in one carton. Summary: Washington, Jefferson and Franklin find themselves inexplicably transported to our times, and explore the country they launched centuries earlier. A thrilling, historical, spellbinding examination of our Founders’ original values and hopes, contrasted beautifully with where we are today. Deeply insightful, a true masterpiece. Author uses their writing for key parts of the dialog, captures their personalities, read this before he finishes the sequel, now in the works. Very limited supply. ----::::---- Click this
image for our "Police Guides for the Public"
page. Learn how they think, and how that helps you -- in your own street survival, and in better understanding them. SHOOTING, TACTICS, AWARENESS, ATTITUDE, TERRORISM, even a cop-jokes book.  These guys get to have all the machine guns they
want. The whole purpose of the Second Amendment is BALANCE OF POWER. Has America lost sight of this crucial principle? We lost this balance in 1986. •  PreFense Preventing Bad Things from Happening to Good People By Steve Tarani, 288 p. #PF $24.95
By a former cop -- The best gunfight is the one you avoid. With a stellar resume in defense, law enforcement and intelligence fields, speaker and educator Tarani opens your thinking about awareness and the kind of prep that keeps you safe and miles away from needing to draw your gun. See incidents coming like the pros do and avoid them entirely instead of reacting—which is halfway to defeat. First-class self-defense training, in a book. ----::::---- SALE PRICE! I'm From the Government and
I'm... Here
to Kill You Dave Hardy's new book takes your breath
away. While you're still
breathing.  This book makes your blood run cold. In the dictionary next to
"chilling" they should have a picture of it. Between
negligence, fatal disasters, deliberate malfeasance, lack of
accountability, secret operations, standard procedures that have no
place in a system like the one we think we have, tanks, grenades, this
is a wake up call -- or a way to prevent sleep. And "they" get away with
it. Maybe
you know about atomic testing to see what effects radiation will have
on humans, or giving people syphilis in labs that resemble German bunker
operations, but what about illegal lethal orders, Veterans Affairs
officials causing death... can anything be done about it all? First you
need to know. Read Dave's new book. I'm From the Government and I'm
Here to Kill You ----::::---- Rules for Radicals
----::::----  Death by Gun Control ----::::----  GET YOURS https://www.gunlaws.com/catalog.htm ----::::---- _______________________________ COMMENTS HELP KEEP ME GOING Alan, I just read that David Hogg and his sister are writing a book that is supposed to hit the book shelves in early June. Being a publisher yourself I was wondering if you could shed a little light on just how they could complete a manuscript, submit it, get it approved and then get it printed and on the market in less than 60 days. My best shot is that they are not writing the book. It's being published based on an already existing manuscript... furnished by one of the well funded and connected anti-2nd-Amendment organizations. What's your take on this? Have a great day. Tom K. (former staff writer and shooting editor for a now defunct outdoorsman magazine) You understand it well Tom. Can't speak to specific details, but this is standard. Ambitious, connected publishers smell opportunity, compete for the mark's signature, lotsa ghosting goes on, book comes out, kid likely gets lousy deal, feels proud. Lotsa bucks at least for publisher. Reality of all this never comes out, everyone inside knows. Media makes it look like the dream, all puffery. Public believes in the dream of innocent fame and fortune. Every myth known to gun control included from his 17-yeard-old mind. Stunning levels of publicity eflouresce, as if he earned it. Alan. -- Alan, Along the lines of you trying to get the media to stop biased language, like referring to killers as "gunmen." I saw more than one station talking about the Tempe police department motorcycles now equipped with "AR-15 semi-automatic rifles," in the station's words. Funny, an AR-15 is in private hands is always an "assault rifle." They never see their own disconnect, do they?! Keep up the good work. -- Jeff B. [Good point! And government forces would never assault the public, even if the Founders armed us exactly for that reason. Send a note about your point to every place you see it misused that way. Let me know if anything happens. At the least, they have to read and confront their own hypocrisy. Alan.] -- Alan: US Dept. of Ed. and U.S. Secret Service research showed that 71% of school killers and attackers had first been bullied by their classmates. My thought is that those provocateur schoolyard bullies should be arrested and tried criminally for accessory before the fact. If the murderer’s defense attorneys raise the issue of provocation, it’s a thought. Ted S. [The provocation idea an interesting one. Don't know there's any legal grounds that would get a conviction beforehand though. Take the case! Alan.] -- Concerning Science News last issue of Page Nine, losing its science: I’m afraid you are right about Science News. I believe they even had an explicit anti-gun headline in one of their promotional emails lately. I unsubscribed at that point. Cheers, Peter S. [It’s gotten much worse. No room this issue of Page Nine, next time. Alan.] I’ve been reading Science News, a formerly fine science magazine since childhood. Same here. And, I didn’t renew, also. Same with Scientific American, as you noted later on. Very sad. Paul My wife and I watch lots of Netflix, disk and streaming. With Susan Rice on the Board of Directors, I’m worried about that. “They” seem to be winning on many fronts. Very sad. Paul B. 4/1/18 -- Dear Alan, About loosely using the word “survivor”: I am a veteran of Tet 1968. Because of that I am usually referred to as “a survivor of Tet ’68.” I rail at that. I am not a survivor, the poor remaining few Viet Cong still standing were the survivors. Regards, fg -- Good morning, Alan, In reference to your query about my joining your email alert group: Actually I found several of your YouTube classics while researching a blog article. I enjoyed your presentations very much. Your style is very non-confrontational and disarmingly (if you will pardon the expression) humorous. I am a resident of Florida and have watched, with interest, the fallout of the Parkland School shooting incident in Broward County. I have watched the predictable politicization of the incident by the political left to suit their agenda and have watched the media exploitation of the articulate group of students who chose to channel their grief into political action. I will be following your site and picking up some of your publications soon. Take care, Ted [Well said Ted. Why not take that 'wound up' and turn it into several hundred evocative words on 1- How it has been politicized, 2- Why it misses the mark, and 3- What the mark is. Might be room for it in the Bill of Rights Sentinel, which I edit. Alan.] -- Mr. Alan, I enjoy your opinion writing (received from GunsAmerica). I like the plain and straight forward way you write with references cited directly with your statements. I live in upstate South Carolina and have been writing my Congressman (Trey Gowdy) and Senators (Tim Scott & Lindsey Graham) but have not received anything other than canned responses. I've quoted you several times (with reference and links) in my emails to them hoping they would educate themselves. It is very discouraging. Your blog entries, however, have served as enlightenment and hope for me. I appreciate your sharing of your clear thinking. Thank you! Don J. [Thanks for the kind words Don. Try meeting with them at their offices. Talk to their staff, make a friend there, that really helps. Also, go after your local paper, you'll eventually get ink, and reach an audience. You write well. It takes time, but works. Alan.] -- Mr. Korwin, I've read several brief articles of yours through links on GunsAmerica. Your writing is a breath of fresh air: calm and reasoned. Not strident, not preaching to the choir, and not taking cheap shots. Just laying it all out there, "don't take my word for it, look at the facts, and decide yourself." Unfortunately, Sigmund Freud's nephew wrote in the late 19th century that facts and reasons don't win arguments, manipulating emotions does. I practice medicine and am appalled and ashamed of my supposedly intelligent colleagues, trained to think critically, who pile onto the "gun control" bandwagon. Keep the good stuff coming! and thank you. M.H. -- Erich, The story behind the London murder rate is who's murdering who. It's there if you look, and is a crucial 2A side of this story. Decent, knife-possessing citizens aren't killing each other. The politically correct immigration policies, the same attacking our 2A rights, are generating every bit of this high-murder-rate problem too. Some of us have to be strong enough to stand against the PC police and say it. That side is out of line. Alan. Comments: I especially liked your remarks of the gun ban movement and infringement. I wish the national propagandists (media) would somehow let that argument slip out. ----::::---- Completed in 2018 at
Age 97! The Autobiography of Irving Korwin
“I didn’t feel old ’til I was 96,” he says
Read all about it here. Or just take a chance, 198 pages with 50 pages of pictures, $19.95
----::::---- KORWIN'S CLOSING COMMENTARY Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony before Congress was just one more nail in the coffin of the now imaginary “free press of the Internet.” While the world expected the Web to create a vast expansion of human knowledge such as the planet had never seen, some folks had other plans. Folks you don't know, can't see, can't find or reach. The global “information superhighway” (remember that term?) has morphed before our eyes to a cloud-covered parking lot, owned by a handful of insanely wealthy left-leaning (socialist) autocrats and their hirelings. The info elite have become so powerful they now threaten governments of the world, which are running scared. They saw they can’t really control this guy -- they don’t even comprehend him or what he does -- and if they off him, which they can, the new boss wields the same power and it solves nothing. I imagine Zuck had to be laughing inwardly, yet sitting there so perfectly, unflappably stoic, brilliant beyond anyone we normally get to hang around with routinely. “You guys are so over. And you don’t even know it,” his brain tells him of Congress, or at least it seemed that way to me. They’re trying to compare him to a Homer Simpson episode for a frame of reference. If you have no word for a thing, you can’t think about it. That's George Orwell's warning to us in his seminal book, 1984. Thought control. Go to Wikipedia and search for “Gun Rights.” It’s not there. “Gun rights” has been replaced by “gun politics” at Wikipedia, and mumbo jumbo under that heading does more to obscure than elucidate. A fundamental civil and human right, ensconced in the U.S. Bill of Rights, has been deleted by people who know better, at what is now Wikiganda. We already know Google skews search results to favor left-wing causes, outfits, people, even words. I research constantly, and it has become rare to use anything but a search engine -- just like you do -- if I'm not actually dealing with live people. By twisting results and becoming advocates instead of providers, the established electro-magnates are digging their own graves. I'll be going elsewhere -- they are empowering and encouraging competition. Free markets and freedom win out. It's human nature. Alan Korwin
https://www.gunlaws.com Guns Save Lives My how you've grown! 
Add yourself to this free list:
|
on gun laws and other topics.
|