1- The 911 Limited Immunity
Act "Provide Miranda-style protection to 911
callers." Preserve the Fifth Amendment, and right to silence and an
attorney
2- Gun-Free-Zone Liability
Act Denying a person's civil rights may be legal, but it's reckless,
negligent and
dangerous. "You can create a gun-free zone, but you're liable for any
harm it causes."
4- Kosher Gun
Laws JPFO has described what a basic set of gun laws ought to
be: http://jpfo.org/articles-assd02/korwin-new-gunlaws.htm
5- Complete
plain-English review of the National Carry
bill From Page Nine No. 172 Will be posted soon if it is not
already, or ask and I'll send you a
copy.
Only
$20 for a 4-Pack so you can give 'em away! Immediate
delivery on Kindle, only
$4.95!
Not a dull dry book about technical stuff,
Q&A on the things newcomers always ask.
Perfect for kids, adults who
are new to the culture,
help someone curl up with
a good book.
:::-—-:::
"A
think piece."
Here's
what America was like -- back when America was
great.
https://www.gunlaws.com/books21Newest.htm
ETHICS An Early American
Handbook (1890 Reprint!) By Benjamin Comegys 128 p. #ET $7.95
You can live up to these simple, decent standards
-- once you remember what they are!
This spells
out the America you’d like to see our nation get back to!
A marvelous little book, a reproduction of the original
1890 text
which describes how good people behave, from honesty to industry,
duty
to playmates to “treatment of dumb animals.” May sound
lightweight
today, but only if you've been dumbed down: you’ll instantly
recognize
what America (and you?) have lost and need back. Worth every penny.
Great for giving thought to the meaning of this holiday
season.
Here is a superb, exciting look at
America's start,
the lessons every school should teach (though most do
not).
Designed for students—but the perfect
refresher for all freedom activists, and home schoolers too. Relive the
roots of liberty, the men, women, places, documents and meanings of this
great
nation. In clear, straightforward language, you get the uncensored truth
about The American Way, with no political-correctness corruption. A
total delight, as you recall things you may have learned in your youth,
which have been whitewashed (newswashed?) and hidden from Americans by a
corrupt school system that is intent on indoctrinating kids instead of
educating them.
You get "A More Perfect Union" DVD, 2-hr. movie,
brilliantly acted and filmed, a fine full-color wall chart with timelines,
the Constitution facsimile and more, a pocket Constitution with Bill of
Rights and Declaration, and a complete Teacher's Guide -- with
quizzes!
$28.00 if purchased separately -- but only $19.95
for the set -- it's worth it!
||||||||||||||||||||||||
"I can't recommend
After You Shoot highly enough!" "Loved it." "Couldn't put it
down." "This book scared me."
Now Available! "My
best book," just not my best seller. [Alan.]
I put more of myself, my wit, my insight, my
heart into this book, it just doesn't have the demand my gun-law books
do. Everyone who gets and reads it tells me how glad they are they
did.
BOMB JOKES @
AIRPORTS
And 186 Other Things You'd
Better Not Say The Not-So-Funny Guide to the Threats To Free
Speech --by Alan Korwin, 352 p., $19.95
Free speech has reached a breaking point
where every
politically correct and diversely foolish idea muzzles you. You can be
fined, fired, jailed or die for speaking your mind. It's a free country
and you can say what you want? Not anymore. Read more
Half the convictions in
self-defense cases come from the 911
recordings.
-- Mitch Vilos, author, Self
Defense Laws of All 50
States
“The
911 Limited-Immunity
Law”
Legislative Statement of
Intent
Whereas the state legislature has enacted law defining
certain circumstances in which a person may lawfully threaten to use or
actually use physical or deadly physical force;
Whereas the state
legislature recognizes a value for justifiable instances of threatened use
or actual use of physical or deadly physical force to be promptly reported
to the appropriate authorities to assist in the prompt dispatching of
emergency medical and law-enforcement personnel;
Whereas the state
legislature recognizes that individuals who threaten or actually use
physical or deadly physical force have a deeply rooted constitutional right
to remain silent, to have an attorney present prior to and during any
questioning, or during the course of a potentially criminal investigation,
and a sacrosanct Fifth Amendment right against
self-incrimination;
Whereas the state legislature desires to
strike a balance between the potentially competing needs for prompt
reporting of such incidents and an individual’s constitutional right
to remain silent, have an attorney present prior to and during questioning,
and be protected from self-incrimination, all of which could delay prompt
reporting;
Therefore, the state legislature hereby enacts the
following statute to provide limited immunity to individuals who are
directly or indirectly involved in an incident involving the threatened or
actual use of physical or deadly physical force if they promptly make a
good-faith effort to report such instances by calling 911 or other
appropriate authorities.
The net
effect of the proposed law is:
1. Encourage people
to contact 911 for assistance by protecting their 5th Amendment and
Miranda rights during the call. People currently lack
self-incrimination protections.
2. Require
the state to gain convictions in claimed but flawed self-defense
cases by relying on everything except self-incrimination from 911 voice
recordings. The state frequently and abusively relies on unsound
self-incrimination.
DRAFT TEXT OF
STATUTE
“LIMITED IMMUNITY FOR CERTAIN
STATEMENTS MADE DURING 911 EMERGENCY CALLS.”
A. Any
individual who is directly or indirectly involved in an incident involving
the threatened or actual use of justifiable physical or deadly physical
force shall be granted limited immunity for all statements made in a
good-faith effort to promptly report such incident to appropriate
authorities in an effort to obtain emergency medical or law-enforcement
assistance.
B. The term “limited immunity” shall mean
that no statement(s) made by an individual in such a good-faith effort may
be used against that individual in any civil or criminal
proceeding.
C. Notwithstanding subsection B, any statement(s) made
by an individual in such a good-faith effort may be used in a legal
proceeding with the consent of the individual after consultation with
competent legal counsel.
D. This grant of limited immunity shall
not apply to the prosecution of false reporting, obstruction of justice,
tampering with evidence or perjury.
E. The contents of a report
made to promptly report an incident involving the threatened or actual use
of justifiable physical or deadly physical force, in a good-faith effort to
obtain emergency medical or law-enforcement assistance, shall not be
released to the public or the news media prior to its use in a trial
involving any such incident. Any such prior release shall be subject to
prosecution as obstruction of justice.
F. Anyone who violates or
attempts to violate the immunity provided in subsection A of this section,
or acts in violation of subsection E of this section, shall be subject to
prosecution as a class 1 misdemeanor for a first offense, a class 6 felony
for a second offense, and a class 5 felony for any additional
offenses.
1. The penalties under subsection F apply whether or not
additional offenses are committed against the same or different persons, or
related to the same or different cases, and regardless of time that may
pass between subsequent
offenses.
###
NOTE: Adding
“Teeth” To The Law
A proposed “teeth”
clause, paragraph F is included, which many laws need. This helps control
employees, authorities, politicians, bureaucrats and other
“officials” who frequently and with impunity violate laws and
emerge unscathed.
Paragraph F is modeled after the highly
successful Posse Comitatus federal law (18 USC §1385). Instead of
saying, as so many laws do (paraphrasing §1385 here),
“It’s illegal to use the military to enforce civilian
law,” which would be toothless against an offender, the statute
instead says, again paraphrasing, “Anyone who uses the military to
enforce civilian law shall go to prison for a long time and pay a very
stiff fine.”
That difference, and people’s
unwillingness to suffer those enumerated consequences, is why America is
not a banana republic. The change is made by putting the law in
“active voice,” not in “passive voice,” making a
person responsible. A “teeth clause” belongs in this new
statute to make it effective. It belongs in any statute where requirements
are placed on government actors. Failure to include teeth clauses is often
proof the politicians have no intention of enforcing the laws they
enact.
Alan
Korwin, Publisher Bloomfield Press "We publish the gun
laws."
4848 E. Cactus, #505-440 Scottsdale, AZ
85254 602-996-4020 Phone 602-494-0679 Fax 1-800-707-4020
Orders https://www.gunlaws.com alan@gunlaws.com
Get our
full-color catalog free, right
now-- https://www.gunlaws.com/pdf/BPCatalog2016.pdf Call, write, fax
or click for a free full-color catalog by mail
"Don't be a
spectator in the struggle to preserve
freedom."
State-by-state Deadly Force Comparison Chart
When can you use deadly force—in your state
What gets innocent gun owners arrested
The biggest myths about self defense
Can you "rack one in" your 12 gauge to stop a threat
For every gun owner—not just CCW permit holders
The line between your rights and the rights of
predators
Includes true-life
examples
-------
CLICK THE IMAGE, READ ALL
ABOUT "The 911 Limited Immunity Law"
2- The Gun-Free Zone
Liability Act of 2018 Improving American Safety
and
Security
Eliminating Bias and
Prejudice
Restoring Constitutional
Values
Dropping the Pretense: "We
don't want your kind eating here."
Establishes
liability for harm caused by criminal conduct, when such conduct is wholly
or partially enabled by limiting an individual’s right or ability to
self defense.
REFERENCE TITLE: Gun-Free-Zone Liability
Act State of Arizona (sponsoring house) Fifty-third
Legislature _________ Regular Session 2018
__.B. _____
Introduced by ________________________
AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 13,
CHAPTER 31, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES BY ADDING A NEW SECTION.
Be
it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Title 13, Chapter 31, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding new
section 13-3123:
A.R.S. §13-3123. Gun-Free-Zone Liability.
A. Any person, organization or entity, or any agency of
government that creates a gun-free zone shall be liable for damages
resulting from criminal conduct that occurs against an individual in such
gun-free zone, if a reasonable person would believe that possession of a
firearm could have helped the individual defend against such
conduct.
1. In the event the conduct is a result of a
terrorist attack as federally defined, or adversely affects a disabled
person, a person who is a member of a minority as federally defined, a
senior citizen or a child under 16 years of age, treble damages shall
apply.
B. For the purposes of this section, criminal
conduct shall include offenses specified under this title in Chapter 11
(Homicide), Chapter 12 (Assault and Related Offenses), Chapter 13
(Kidnapping), Chapter 14 (Sexual Offenses), Chapter 15 (Criminal Trespass
and Burglary), Chapter 17 (Arson), Chapter 19 (Robbery), Chapter 25 (Escape
and Related Offenses), Chapter 29 (Offenses Against Public Order) and
Chapter 36 (Family Offenses).
C. For the purposes of
this section, the term “gun-free zone” shall mean any building,
place, area or curtilage that is open to the public, or in or upon any
public conveyance, where a person’s right or ability to keep arms or
to bear arms is infringed, restricted or diminished in any way by statute,
policy, rule, regulation, ordinance, utterance or posted
signs.
============
Gun Free Zone Bill Talking
Points
1. It’s important
to remember “gun-free zones” aren’t gun free at
all—anyone with a gun can come and go at will—the signs stop no
one, but honest people may feel honor bound to obey, relinquish their
rights and disarm themselves before entry.
2.
Federal law matches this bill—it is a federal crime to deny a
person’s rights (‘Anyone who, under color of any law, statute,
ordinance, custom or regulation, willfully deprives any person of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution
or laws of the United States, shall be fined, or imprisoned...’) 18
USC §241 et seq.
3. The bill is perfectly
constitutional: it treats all facilities with so-called gun-free zones and
without so-called gun-free zones the same as all others. It provides equal
treatment under the law, protection of civil and human
rights.
4. A store owner who simply lets people
come and go in peace has no consequences under this
bill.
5. Store owners who attempt to deny people
their civil rights under the Constitution by posting a no-guns sign might
create a liability for themselves if a person is harmed while on the
premises. Other potential criminal penalties are
unaffected.
6. America abandoned the bad concept
that “we don’t want your kind in our store” nearly a
century ago, and this disgraceful effort to deny civil rights should end.
It is offensive to a large segment of the law-abiding
public.
7. Insurance companies who tell their
clients they must post the signs or lose coverage are being
untruthful—the signs do nothing actual, provide no protection, no law
supports such action, no coverage is lost, it is a disgraceful political
position and anti-rights agenda, nothing more. Threats of removing
insurance coverage verge on extortion for political
purpose.
8. Creating a
“make-believe” gun-free zone is known to be dangerous, reckless
and negligent. Virtually all mass homicidal attacks have taken place where
the public has been disarmed by the well-meaning but feckless signs and
policies.
9. True gun-free zones have a purpose
and we support these, even though they are expensive and involved,
requiring controlled access and egress, metal detectors, staffing and
training, like at airports and courts.
10. The desire to erect
pretend gun-free zones by posting signs that essentially state, “In
this building you are protected by this sign” reflects
hoplophobia, a morbid fear of weapons. These people should consider
treatment, not the denial of rights for their neighbors, to satisfy their
own fears, recklessly subjecting others to
danger.
================
Presentation
to Committee:
If a store owner allows a no-guns sign
attempting to prevent the civil rights of law-abiding people from lawfully
entering with a firearm -- and a person is harmed in an attack while in the
store, the store owner faces a possible liability for the reckless,
negligent and dangerous denial of the person’s civil
rights.
If on the other hand a store owner allows no
such sign and simply lets people come and go in peace, and makes no effort
to deny people’s fundamental human rights as they enter, they have no
liability outside what they normally have in routine
business.
That’s all this law
does.
The notion that people can deny your civil rights
and ban your constitutionally protected property by posting signs is as
insulting and wrong as racist signs that long ago banned people from eating
at a lunch counter or sipping water at a fountain. Aside from the extreme
danger these pretend gun-free zones create, where no one with a gun is
actually stopped from entering, it is time for its offensiveness to be
recognized, and this sort of bias and prejudice to
end.
As a side note, to paraphrase federal law, it is a
felony if ‘Anyone, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, custom
or regulation, willfully deprives any person of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, and shall be fined, or imprisoned...’ 18 USC §241 et
seq.
================
JUSTIFICATION
The Gun-Free-Zone Liability
Act -- “If you create a make-believe gun-free zone,
you’re liable for any harm it
causes.”
So-called “gun-free zones,”
implemented privately with door signs or by government with laws and rules,
are reckless, negligent and known to be dangerous. “Your children at
this school are protected by this sign.” Right.
After years
of delay, recent murder rampages have alerted the public and legislators to
the fact that so-called “gun-free zones” are anything but gun
free. They are free-fire zones where psychopaths know they will meet
defenseless victims and no resistance.
The Gun-Free-Zone Liability
Act meets this challenge head on.
The bill respects private
property rights and allows anyone to declare a make-believe “gun-free
zone.” There is no cost to government. It simply attaches liability
if a well intentioned but fraudulent “gun-free zone” causes
harm.
The bill had been previously introduced in Arizona, and in
Georgia and New Hampshire, but failed to pass at first. It will be in
Arizona again in 2018 and is under consideration in other
states.
The Gun-Free-Zone Liability Act has excellent value even
if it isn’t enacted in its first years -- it is a just and
common-sense bill that would help protect the public. Resisting its
reasonable provisions requires taking the moral low ground -- that you have
no right to defend yourself, or that your civil right to arms can be denied
by a wall sign.
A lot of very bad gun bills are planned, so
it’s critical to balance that with bills as positive as this one. Ask
your legislators to at least look at the bill and support it. Basically,
“If you create a make-believe gun-free zone, you’re liable for
any harm it causes.”
===============
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
GUN-FREE-ZONE LIABILITY ACT
“If you create
a pretend gun-free zone, you’re liable for any harm it
causes.”
Backgrounder
Originally
introduced in Arizona as The Defenseless Victim Act of 2002, this bill
recognizes that so-called “gun-free zones,” recklessly made and
typically with no alternative security provided, border on the absurd,
i.e., “NOTICE: You are protected by this
sign.”
The original impetus for the bill came after
"gun-free" massacres at the Luby's cafeteria in Texas, the Wakefield, Mass.
slayings, and finally the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, where
pilots and passengers were defenseless, in the false name of
security.
Congress responded to the muslim jihad assault
on our airlines with the “Arm The Pilots” law. The rest of the
nation needs a similarly common-sense response.
The death toll at
pretend “gun-free zones” continues to mount. The list is well
known and needs no repeating -- which mass murderers revel in -- and
repetition is known to encourage copycat activity.
These posted
locations are proud of their “no guns allowed” signs, laws or
policies that keep out even FBI-certified citizens with proper permits --
despite the disastrous results. The murderers, as in all such cases,
disobey the signs or laws, which surprises no one, not even the media. The
news media continues to suppress stories where armed individuals stop such
mayhem. See for example, The Bias Against Guns, by John Lott, for
numerous egregious examples, or simply Google the subject, which mainstream
outlets refuse to do, or refuse to reveal.
The Gun-Free-Zone
Liability Act basically says that, in public places, if you create one of
these dangerous make-believe gun-free zones, you’re liable for any
harm it causes. There is no cost or budget item associated with enacting
this bill.
The idea that make-believe gun-free zones are safe --
is fraudulent.
It is a mythology perpetrated by anti-rights
activists who can often be recognized by their beliefs that:
1 -
self defense should be illegal,
2 - guns should be
confiscated,
3 - no one but “authorities” should have
guns,
4 - your right to arms can be denied by posting
signs,
5 - government can take care of you better than you
can.
The anti-self-defense lobby tells you
to rely upon the police for your safety, but they always omit these
inconvenient facts:
1 - Police have absolutely no legal duty to
protect you;
2 - Authorities routinely respond only after an event
to pick up the pieces;
3 - When seconds count, the police are just
minutes away;
4 -
They like parading around in full battle dress for the cameras, for hours,
after the action is over.
In the tragic homicides referred to
above, and countless others you see on TV, the police don’t draw
their guns, they draw chalk lines when you’re
gone.*
A person who would deny your right or
ability to self defense is as violent and wrong as the person who assaults
you.
Acting in self defense against a criminal
assault is legally guaranteed in all 50 states and federally, as it should
be. It is as old as the first written laws of civilization (Code of
Hammurabi, Five Books of Moses). Denying the fundamental right to self
preservation is unjust, immoral, dangerous and should not be
tolerated.
The notion that make-believe gun-free
zones are safe is fraud perpetrated on the public:
a) Only
innocent victims like you and me are affected. Armed criminals ignore
no-guns signs and could care less -- they’re laughing at you.
b) No alternate form of security is provided. You are knowingly
and recklessly made vulnerable, while property management accepts no
responsibility for your safety or their negligent behavior. The bill
addresses only blatantly anti-gun-rights actions that would callously
disarm you and ignore your plight.
c) Despite bias in news
coverage and the fear-mongering left, privately held firearms have been
repeatedly shown to deter and prevent crime in one scholarly study after
another (detailed at great length in Armed, by Kleck and Kates). Since the
nation’s inception we have known and embraced the freedom-giving
truth that guns protect the innocent, and that this is good.
d)
Denial of your civil rights under color of law is a federal offense under
18 USC §241 and 18 USC § 242:
The Gist: Anyone who,
under color of any law, statute, ordinance, custom or regulation, willfully
deprives any person of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or
protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, shall be fined,
or imprisoned for up to one year, or both.
If bodily injury
results, or if the violation includes the use or attempted or threatened
use of a dangerous weapon, explosive or fire, the prison term rises to up
to ten years. If death results, or if such acts include kidnapping,
attempted kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault, attempted aggravated
sexual assault, or an attempt to kill, the violator may be fined,
imprisoned for any term of years up to life, or put to
death.
Initial reactions to the Gun-Free-Zone
Liability Act have been highly supportive by knowledgeable people in the
gun-rights movement. It has the potential and broad value to become a major
national issue. This could turn into one of the key gun topics of the
decade (literally, the right to bear arms), especially if terrorist attacks
and media-fueled copycat mass murders continue and defenseless innocent
victims are slaughtered.
What good is the right to
arms, if possession is banned everywhere?
The
public-opinion value, forcing the opposition to support helplessness and
victimization, are worth the effort. Now is a good time to bring this issue
into the spotlight. All state legislatures should at least have similar
bills introduced showing support for the principles
involved.
The bill was first introduced as HB2456,
sponsored by a dozen representatives, in the 45th session in Arizona
(2002). The legislators say it gives them something to sink their teeth
into. Give your legislators something this good -- ask them to introduce
the Gun-Free-Zone Liability Act in your state, for all the right reasons.
Three states have had the bill on their floor, Arizona, Georgia and New
Hampshire. Your state belongs on this list. Reach out to your elected
representatives and encourage them to act. Bring the bill language to them,
in person, on paper. Much more effective than just another
email.
Some additional observations appear
following the bill text below.
-- This is good law, supportive of
our fundamental rights,
-- a deterrent to criminals who would
perpetrate attacks,
-- a winner in the publicity battle over gun
rights,
-- it places responsibility squarely on those who cause
harm by their direct actions.
It deserves to be
enacted.
Please give it your support.
Ask
your representatives to introduce and vote for
The Gun-Free-Zone
Liability
Act.
ADDITIONAL
IMPORTANT POINTS
• If you have a problem
with holding people accountable for death and mayhem they cause by enabling
crime, then of course you’ll be against the Gun-Free-Zone Liability
Act. That’s a position some anti-rights activists may take. Bring
‘em on. If nothing happens, i.e., they’re correct and
make-believe gun-free zones are pleasant, safe and crime free, then the
bill has ZERO effect on anything -- and costs nothing. Personally, I think
that facet is particularly edifying. Sort of like, what harm could it
do?
• Despite what some people have claimed,
private property rights are unaffected by the Gun-Free-Zone Liability Act.
Read it yourself and see. Gun-free zones are allowed, entirely at a
property owner’s free discretion just as they are now, and property
rights remain 100% intact. You can keep guns, ban guns, allow only one
type, open, discreet, it doesn’t matter, and the new law is silent on
this. There is NO coercion (and also no government spending!) in this bill
at all. That’s a big part of its beauty. In fact, only people who
would ban your rights and ignore your plight are affected in any way, and
then only if you’re attacked and harmed on their grounds. No blood no
foul. It’s a truly balanced and even-handed
bill.
• Also note that truly private
property like your home or ranch are exempt from the bill. ONLY public
property or property open to the public is affected. There is a clear
difference (well, some diehard libertarians might not agree, but you
can’t please everyone) between truly private property (like your
home) and a place that is open to the public and privately run, like a
mall, or WalMart. Public places have a well-established duty to provide a
reasonably safe environment, and they have been getting a free ride on this
issue, at your expense. They can still ban guns remember, and you can still
go shop elsewhere. For a wonderful “No-Guns-No-Money” wallet
card that you can leave with stores that won’t allow you to enter
armed, visit the Arizona Citizens Defense League
site.
• All this does is make clear that
whoever creates an obviously dangerous situation, by forcing the
disarmament of innocent people entering -- which they’re still fully
entitled to do under the bill -- there’s a consequence for that risky
action. As there should be for creating such a self-evidently unsafe
situation. And it only matters if the danger manifests, and some psychopath
turns some hair parlor into a victim zone. If there’s no assault,
then there’s no problem. Gun-o-phobes can sleep tight thinking the
rest of us are just a bunch of paranoids. The bill merely addresses
criminally misguided notions of safety.
•
You may find that your legislators object on grounds that are hard to
justify. I’ve had some tell me the bill would be fine if it only
limited businesses, and left the government’s make-believe gun-free
zones, like parks and buses, intact (talk about hubris!). Other
legislators, including an attorney whose clients are in business, say
businesses should be excluded but government must be controlled! Just
emphasize that make-believe gun-free zones are dangerous -- who sets them
up is not the issue.
• Try thinking of this
as the Luby’s Massacre Act. Maybe that will help emphasize the
blatant and profound fraud of proposing make-believe gun-free zones as
safety nets. The heartless, insensitive, thoughtless perpetrators of
defenseless victim zones should be ashamed of themselves. At the very least
they must be held accountable.
• Try
thinking of this as the Come-And-Go-As-You-Please Act. Instead of disarming
in your car, using gun lockers, or avoiding some places altogether, you
just travel about, armed or not as you prefer, and that’s all.
It’s so much better when public places just let people come and go as
they please, without signs and bans, to simply go about their business.
This is how most public places act, and it is responsible or even
patriotic. Think about it -- on a day-to-day basis, places without these
deceptive gun-bans operate just fine. Going into 2018, Arizona has more
than 325,000 CCW-permit holders, and many other openly armed citizens,
routinely, legally and peacefully coming and
going.
• Think about what the opposition
will have to sound like to say they don’t want any liability for
murdered victims they had disarmed. They have to stand up for
defenselessness. It’s a good time for the Gun-Free-Zone Liability
Act.
* This phrase from a Cartridge Family Band
song is used with permission.
A
version of the bill was first introduced in Arizona (HB2456 in 2002) by
Rep. Randy Graf (R-6th), with considerable support (12
sponsors!).
In 2003, Rep. Graf re-introduced it in Arizona (HB
2320). The state of Georgia joined the effort to enact this important new
legislation with HB31, introduced by Rep. Bobby Franklin (R-17th). At least
two other states actively considered the bill. In 2008 the bill was
introduced again in Arizona as SB1159. Prosecutors opposed the bill several
years ago on the grounds that: without those excited utterances we won't be
able to convict half the people we do. This is a partial
list.
EMERGENCY A liberal's view of surviving
almost anything NY Times best-selling author Neil
Strauss, 418 p., $9.99
A survival guide from the left -- unlike any survival book you
have seen. The author includes things you have never even considered. It
turns out liberals fear a world collapse just like everyone, maybe
more. Financial upheaval, interruption of food, water or power supply,
superbugs, muslims, nukes, martial law, it's a long list -- and here is a
very fresh perspective -- how to survive and thrive with a left-wing
slant. You're not adequately prepared if you don't look
through this window into another world. Includes living tax-free,
turning a credit card into a knife, death cults, asset protection,
evading snipers, bikes of the apocalypse (gotta love it!), escaped-felon
secrets, much more.
SURVIVING A MASS
KILLER RAMPAGE By Chris Bird, 408 p. #SAMK $22.95
One of the top writers in the field today challenges
you to survive, armed or not, shows you how ordinary people fought
back
against mass murderers and won. Police arrive too late—it’s up
to
you—thrilling, detailed descriptions of what actually happened, guns
used, shots fired, the stuff “news” reports never include Bird
has found and
revealed, totally exciting and illuminating, police and civilian
actions and bloody results. Remember: gun-free zones aren’t.
Women don't fight like men -- no
bragging
or machismo, it's about getting away from
danger, whatever it takes, and fierce
defense of kids and family. The editor of Concealed Carry
Magazine
for seven years, now a firearms instructor, brings her enormous talent and
experience to this book
for women, an excellent addition to the limited material available
specifically for women.
Covers all the bases, an all-around guide for
carry and use. Click the link for numerous choices about family gun
safety.
This thick paperback
remains among the most comprehensive guides to crime avoidance and personal
security every written.
Get the
facts on every aspect of personal safety, from
evasive
driving to planting cactus by your windows.
Lifesaving
techniques
will help keep you, your family and your possessions
safe, prepare
you for defense if it becomes necessary, and guide you
in buying
lethal and less-than-lethal goods, from locks to
firearms. This classic is finally back in print after being unavailable
for more than a year!
:::-—-:::
BY FORCE OF
PATRIOTS By Cameron Reddy 520 pgs. #BFO $17.95
How about a nice shoot 'em up where our
side wins... In a world flipped upside down by
liberals and political correctness, all three branches of federal
government assert unknown levels of coercive power until fed up
Americans rise up to take back their country. More than a tale of
oppression and rebellion, it examines how America strayed from its
roots, with intriguing, colorful characters who grapple with the social,
political and legal issues at the heart of America’s difficulties.
Raw,
provocative, not for the faint of heart.
:::-—-:::
YOU AND THE
POLICE YOU
AND THE POLICE
by Boston T. Party. $16
A very important book -- what to do if you're stopped by
the police for any reason.
Packed with ideas on how
to handle a stop, and reviews the rights you do and do
not have. What do you say and do if a cop wants to search your car?
Do you have to tell if you have a gun? Must you show ID if you're not under
arrest? What should you
do if you are arrested? How can you talk your way
out of
a ticket? What are the limits on warrantless
searches? You
may know about guns
and self defense, but you're not ready without this
information.
Every
country has gun rights, ranges and rules -- some far better than
others... where do you hail from?
THE WORLDWIDE GUN
OWNER'S GUIDE
It's never been done before -- a 64-nation guide to the world's gun
laws! We can learn a lot from other gun cultures. See their laws, local
prices, who can bear arms, what you can possess (military ordnance in
some places!), clubs and contacts -- America is not alone in the
struggle to protect and enjoy the right to arms! Complete chart of gun
freedom for every nation. Read
more
Illustrated, with national rankings
:::-—-:::
TACTICAL BIBLE
STORIES
by Rob Robideau. Only $12.95 +S&H
The author has taken familiar, famous
battles and confrontations in the Bible
and distilled the self-defense
and personal-safety lessons you can learn from Scripture.
The Bible is packed
with tales that demonstrate techniques for
winning or losing armed confrontations. The author writes
through that lens.
One more way
to think about and explore an essential good
book.
Tactical Bible
Stories.
Beautifully illustrated
with pen-and-ink drawings of Biblical times.
:::-—-:::
||||||||||||||
EXTRA SPECIAL "DEATH BY GUN CONTROL"
We've stumbled upon a cache of this formerly
unavailable book -- originally $12.95 if you could get
one:
ONLY $7.00 -- only while they
last!
Carefully researched, totally riveting,
the true details of how "reasonable gun control" was used to enable
genocide in one country after another -- how it works, why people buy
into the promise, how tyrants use it to gain power and murder people by
the millions. The Genocide Formula, national case histories, the U.N.,
even the psychology of true believers.
Death
by Gun Control (Limited
supply, like new, covers lightly scuffed) by Aaron
Zelman and Richard Stevens, Only $7.00! (The late Aaron
Zelman was the founder of JPFO)
If you like Alan Korwin’s work,
here’s a great way to enjoy his best-selling national titles, at one
great price. The groundbreaking After You Shoot (so you
don’t help convict yourself), Gun Laws of America (the
unabridged guide to every federal gun law), The Heller Case (the
lawsuit that saved the 2nd Amendment), Supreme Court Gun Cases (on
CD), Bomb Jokes at Airports
(help save free speech), plus 100 Guns Save Lives heart stickers, and
his latest, designed to bring your gunless friends on board -- Your
First Gun: Should You Buy One and Join 60 Million Safely Armed American
Homes? A smokin’ deal!
$107.75 if purchased separately -- but only $69.95 for
the set -- Save $37.80!
Alan has a style -- it shows in this website, in his
speeches across the
nation, in his frequent appearances on radio and TV, and perhaps most
of all, in his books, where he can spend the time needed to carefully
craft a message, do the legwork, and produce the outstanding work that
has catalyzed his career. Just enough humor and irony pokes needed fun
at the foibles of modern society and its holier-than-thou snobs. You'll
know why Alan has such a dedicated following, and likely become a fan
yourself, with this one-of-a-kind set of books.
WHY EVERYONE MUST LEARN TO
SHOOT!
The Newest Gran’pa Jack ILLUSTRATED BOOKLET
Co-Written by ALAN KORWIN !
Why Jews
Must Learn To Shoot! Gran'pa Jack #9
Kjartan Arnorsson and Alan Korwin, with the late Ray
Carter
24 pgs., only $3, or 2 for $5, we pay the
postage!
So politically incorrect it could catch fire, the
reasons everyone
should learn how to shoot, with all the villains who want to kill you
and destroy America named. We wake up anyone who doesn't realize the
schools are keeping our kids ignorant, religious leaders are practically
worse, and politicians who should help get you trained instead are
seeking to disarm us. Blacks, Arabs, drug lords, The U.N., muslims,
muggers, thieves, bad cops, we spare no one in a quest to motivate the
naive to action. A thrilling teaching tool, get a few, enjoy it, and
pass them around. You owe it to your family and friends to spread the
word -- encourage learn to shoot!
One copy, $3, free
shipping Two copies, $5, still
free shipping
Get a dozen for $20 bucks and really do some good
with them. (S&H at cost)
The most consumer-friendly starter guide to the popular
trend of
carrying firearms in daily life. If you've decided to live the armed
lifestyle and discreetly bear arms as you go about your affairs, this
full-color glossy production will bring you up to speed in a modern way
you'd expect from a national retailer. Professionally modeled, drawn and
photographed images illustrate all aspects of the gear, operations,
body positions and motions, indoor and outdoor scenarios related to
firearms ownership and use. Terse and crisp text, in blocks next to the
images keep this upbeat and attention grabbing, applying the knowledge
you need right where you need it. Introductions to the main topics give
you more in-depth juice. Get the advanced guide too for more shooting
techniques, improved accuracy, holster and
carry options, ammo types, firearm sights and practice skills and more to
improve
your results as a gun owner.
||||
Alan Korwin
Bloomfield Press
"We publish the gun laws."
4848 E. Cactus, #505-440
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
602-996-4020 Phone
602-494-0679 Fax
1-800-707-4020 Orders
https://www.gunlaws.com
alan@gunlaws.com
Call, write, fax or click for our
f r e e full-color
catalog
Guns Save Lives
Guns Stop Crime
Guns Are Why America Is Still F r e e
My how you've grown!
Add yourself to this free list:
(Alan's private email list -- used infrequently for Page Nine
and gun-law updates; you can unsubscribe at any time)