1-
Illegals Crossing Mexican Border
"Plummets" Only a
quarter million in 2015. Too low for
news? 2- No-Fly No-Buy Lie Won't
Die "Too
dangerous to go through an airport scanner— but strolling our
streets and driving?" It doesn't even make
sense. 3- Media Lies About Sex
Remarks (Sexy)
Hypocrisy, distortion, can't sink low
enough 4- Both Sides Fight "Open"
Elections Repubs
and Democs Work to Swing
Results 5- Arizona Gun Law Has
Tripled Chart
attached
6- Arizona Voter Propositions
205 &
206 EARLY VOTE
CAUTION
Crossroads of the West Gun Show, Dec.
2-4 Phoenix Fairgrounds -- three days --
Biggest of the year
STARTERS
Questions I Can't Answer
Questions have
crossed my desk that I can't answer. What do you say?
At what
point of federal encroachment should a state secede? Never?
When
does a law, or a set of laws, if the system allows them to
stand, become so tyrannical that they should not be
obeyed?
Can five people in black robes at the U.S. Supreme Court
really re-write the U.S. Constitution? What are the options if they
do? (Art. III, Sec. 2., Cl. 2)
I've heard this one asked, but
it strikes me as silly, and the answer is too obvious:
Q: Is
the idea of the nation-state still relevant, and does national sovereignty
matter? A: Yes, of course, a long practical and philosophical answer.
Later. Maybe.
||||
From The Wayback Machine The Wall Street
Journal reported on page one, back when Bill Clinton took
office, he spent $12 million taxpayer dollars on his inauguration
party. People were choking on their breakfast cereal when they read that,
it was unheard of. He and the democrats (who got to go to the multi-day
affairs, and I do mean affairs if you catch my drift) scoffed it off. Hey,
they earned it right?
I'm taking bets on the cost for the next
one, whoever wins.
||||
Secret Messages From Now
On You just have to wonder how Hillary -- or
anyone -- is going to send private secure messages going forward. Ear
whispers with loud background music? Private chats from plane to plane on
the tarmac. Scribbled notes hand carried then burned (subject to
interception en route). With the NSA and WikiGotcha operating, even the
U.S. presidency is reduced to unwanted incriminating evidence trails. Want
ads for bin Laden couriers are circulating.
||||
500 People Show Up Armed For
Dinner Slowest Waiters All Make It Home Alive Open-carry
banquet a splendid affair, 11th year in a row Arizona Citizens Defense
League Annual Meeting sold-out, total success, auction,
speeches, sign up early next year, the seats go
fast.
||||
POLITICAL PLEDGE YOU WON'T HEAR
Will you pledge to never sign any legislation you haven't
read, personally?
Everyone knows this is right. Politicians have
forgotten this. Sure, reading everything will slow things way down. That's
the point. And absolutely no voting on 1,000-page bills that haven't been
distributed yet -- that would be malfeasance and grounds for dismissal in
business.
Followup: Will you agree to step down from office if you
vote for a bill you haven't read?
THE LAW OF SELF
DEFENSE (for all 50 states) The Indispensable Guide for the Armed
Citizen By Attorney Andrew F. Branca 292 pgs. #LOSD
$25
Complete 50-state self-defense guide:
You carry a
gun so you’re hard to kill. Read this book so you’re hard to
convict.
An easy to understand, entertaining and informative manual that covers
self-defense law in all 50 states. Clearly explains not just statutes
but how courts apply them, it corrects myths that get people in trouble,
highly praised by many self-defense legends. Includes illuminating,
gut-wrenching, true-life examples. Covers Reasonableness, Innocence,
Imminence, Avoidance, and Proportionality, handling 911 and first
responders, prejudiced witnesses and biased media, your state’s
nuances,
effective legal strategies.
:::-—-:::
1-
Only 250,000 Illegals Flood Across Border Media
Heralds This as Great
News
Invasion by a
quarter million isn't a problem?
The lamestream media told
you: The lamestream media told you:
(Daniel Gonzalez) --
"How many migrants successfully enter the U.S. each year by crossing the
border illegally?
"According to recent polls, Americans believe
the number has been increasing rapidly, while in fact, the number has
decreased significantly. Increased border security already in place is a
major reason.
"New research by a former Dept. of Homeland Security
official found that successful illegal entries, including people who had
crossed multiple times, plummeted to 250,000 in 2015. That figure
represents one-tenth as many successful illegal crossings as in 2005, the
study reports..."
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however
that:
He
claims the $130 billion spent on added security has been a major deterrent
to Mexicans. Presumably, it has been a deterrent to Central Americans too,
and the muslim jihadis other sources tell us are coming across the southern
border and insinuating themselves into our midst.
Why this study
comes from a retired individual and not an agency is unexplained. How this
person counts people who slipped through undetected is unexplained. How the
person figures out some of them came in, were deported, and came back
again, undetected, is unexplained. Why we should accept any of this is
unexplained.
The next effect of a quarter-million illegal alien
invaders whose destination and intentions are unknown, this year alone,
should be terrifying, not presented as a vast improvement. Where is last
year's batch of invaders? That's enough to replace the entire population of
cities like Orlando, Jersey City, Ft. Wayne, Madison, Norfolk, Scottsdale,
Baton Rouge, Boise, Spokane, or Berkeley twice over. The rumor that in
Berkeley this would be an improvement was unexplained.
In other
news, during his Senate race debate, Sen. John McCain claimed we are
building border watchtowers at a cost of $3 million each (PBS-TV,
10/10/16). You can buy a 4,000-foot mansion for $3 million, with
state-of-the-art security, a pool, a putting green and multiple bedrooms
and baths. Just what kind of guard towers are these? (He didn't elaborate.)
Requests for information from the three reporters went immediately
unanswered, and still.
If a security system grants unauthorized
access to 685 people every day (do the math), and this is a vast
improvement over the prior system (which it apparently is), someone's head
belongs on a pike, and I'm not referring to the
illegals.
:::-—-:::
2- Hillary Insists: No-Fly No-Buy
for Guns She confirms her stance in 3rd
debate.
"Gunism" runs rampant in lamestream media and leftist
circles.
Ignorance, prejudice, bias
are front and center when the subject is
firearms.
Reporters fail to ask even the most basic
questions:
If you can't fly, why
can you drive?
Why are you even out walking around?
How
can a person be too dangerous to go through a metal detector?
What
are they charged with,
exactly? Nothing, except the prejudice of
gunism.
We should
take away all their other guns too, if they can't buy a new one,
right? It makes no sense to deny a person a flight, but
let them keep all their guns, based on a secret police list you can't
see -- that they're not told they're on, that only keeps them from
buying new guns at retail. Does that get you confused too?
The
whole idea makes no sense, but the democrats cheer like crazy. Like
crazy.
It sounds like proof. Liberalism is a mental
disorder.
The idea that Hillary wants to ban your right to have a
gun with a list she can write your name on has a name -- it's
called tyrannical.
It's not about air
safety.
||||
We have new books for you! Click the image and
browse a
bit
Come back here
when you're done reading the Page Nine
news!
:::-—-:::
BACK IN PRINT AT
LAST!
This great classic by the master, Massad
Ayoob, forms the basis from less-than-lethal to armed safety
strategy.
THE
TRUTH ABOUT SELF-PROTECTION
by Masaad Ayoob. $19.95
Get the facts on every aspect of personal safety, from
evasive
driving to planting cactus by your windows.
Lifesaving
techniques
will help keep you, your family and your possessions
safe, prepare
you for defense if it becomes necessary, and guide you
in buying
lethal and less-than-lethal goods, from locks to
firearms. This classic is finally back in print after being unavailable
for more than a year!
:::-—-:::
Cop
Jokes
By Lou Savelli and Stuart Moss 140 p. #CJ
$9.95
Lighten up with the hysterical book by former police
officers who've collected humor for years about their
profession, victims, criminal offenders, the justice system, no one is
immune from
their scathing wit, I laughed out loud a lot. How many cops does it
take
to throw a guy down the stairs? The guy fell.
:::-—-:::
3- Media Lies About Sex Remarks They make things up
when reality isn't dark enough
The
lamestream media told you: The lamestream media told
you:
"Trump talks about being able to 'do anything' to women
because he is famous..." -- trumped up by USA Today, on page
one, 10/9/16, by David M. Jackson.
The Uninvited Ombudsman
notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however
that:
Trump actually said, "When you’re a star, they
let you do it. You can do anything..." And he went on in greater
detail. http://tinyurl.com/zx8fs9d
The
media, completely in the tank for the other candidate, the female who
repeatedly attacked other women for complaining about her husband's
documentedsexual assaults on them, will distort and pour
guilt on the world to deny hard reality. So here it is:
Men are
pigs and deserve to die.
OK, there it is. Satisfied? Now that's
out of the way, let's get down to the truth.
The object of every
teenage boy's desire is women's private parts, that's just the way it is.
This continues unabated for decades. I have to tell you this? If you're a
man, or a woman, you already know this.
The political left
promotes this in every communications vehicle that exists. Now it is
attempting to destroy America on this very point with unabashed guilt --
they have the core of the republican establishment, and their own party,
and the media -- denying this basic biological, social and cultural TRUTH.
What a win for their side.
Watch a movie. Or TV. Or the
best-seller list. Non-stop objectification of women. Look at the woman
supposedly the object of Mr. Trump's remarks -- Nancy O'Dell,
who dresses and acts as sexually provocative as she possibly can. Who's
kidding who? Her show is obsessed with who's zooming who, it is its
raison detre. The attention lavished on Mr. Trump has simply brought
this to the table (and floor, and wall, and bathroom, and bushes, and back
of the bar).
You focused on her eyes, right? Nancy
O'Dell
Since childhood I have wondered,
without answer, why women are dressed in a piece of cloth that deliberately
exposes their main private part. The object of rape, incest, lust,
adultery, infidelity, passion, romance novels, dirty jokes, leaked bawdy
tapes. Whose idea was the dress and the skirt? Why does it persist? Why
isn't that part covered, protected? I've been told that's not "ladylike."
Say what?
Nightly "news" is drowning in these exposure clothes.
Temptation garments. "She's asking for it" rags. The women, dolled
up to the nines, bleached blonde, have to sit with their legs crossed --
all of them all of the time -- so they don't expose themselves. This
is right? Don't their legs fall asleep? Mine would.
You saw the
ultimate example: Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct (I could not have
picked a better name). This is no secret. The holier than thou ranting on
"news" shows is abject nonsense, total hypocrisy. Starting watching for it.
Keep count.
No objectification here
Before I
turned off the "news" version, I switched by chance quickly to the movie
Horrible Bosses*, in time to see Jason Sudeikis ogle some guy's wife
in their wedding photo, and remark, "I'd like to bend her over a barrel and
show her the 50 states!" A mild, inconsequential remark like a thousand
others to be found non-stop from Hollywood, leading the charge on
objectification education of our children and ourselves.
Newscasters should be
immune from criticism because they maintain high standards.
Hot.
Trump's remarks weren't locker-room
talk. They were every-day talk. We all know it despite the denials. In
fact, thanks to the denials. And women with their legs out encourage it.
Don't play coy. You know it. "I am sickened by what I heard." (House
Speaker Paul Ryan). Bull. "I was wrong." (Donald Trump). Everyone knows he
was forced to say that. It was a normal remark men make and will continue
to make unless the left emasculates us to the nub.
"No woman
should ever be described in these terms, ever." (Reince Priebus, party
chairman). He doesn't get out much, has been totally manipulated by guilt
and the left, who revel in describing women in these terms on the big
screen. "No apology can excuse the reprehensible remarks" (Jeb Bush). So he
never went to a sports game and saw mostly naked cheerleaders. Have you
ever seen Lingerie football?
People are falling over each other to
lie and say they never heard of such a thing.
*Jennifer Anniston has a snack in Horrible
Bosses. You must be 17 to see this film (or bring an adult).
Anniston, a woman, has no problem advancing normal objectification
stereotypes.
The person currently in the
White House duplicitously attacks a candidate's speech, while
inviting the worst of the worst to visit the White House -- batches of
rappers with lyrics too gross to repeat, F bombs, bitches, hoes,
murder, degrading demeaning abuse, elevating them to respectability
without caveat. Artists like Killer Mike with his hits One More
Gram, F*ck You Pay Me, The Next Bitch, and of course Gat
Totin'.
Beyonce His
wife calls Beyonce a role model for her girls --
just watch her videos, read
her lyrics, see if you think solid American values are remotely
connected. Yes, the images are gross, sorry, it makes the
point.
"News" media is
AWOL.
||||
ETHICS An Early American
Handbook (1890 Reprint!) By Benjamin Comegys 128 p. #ET $7.95
Can YOU live up to these simple, decent
standards—but
they spell out the America you’d like to see our nation get back to!
This marvelous little book, a reproduction of the original 1890 text
which describes how good people behave, from honesty to industry,
duty
to playmates to “treatment of dumb animals.” May sound
lightweight
today, but only if you've been dumbed down: you’ll instantly
recognize
what America (and you?) have lost and need back. Worth every penny. Fun to
read.
:::-—-:::
4- Both Sides Fight "Open"
Elections
Left and
Right Do It Differently, Both Do
It
The ACLU told you: The ACLU
told you:
"Dear Friend, The election is just weeks away,
and the right to vote is still under attack. Every citizen deserves to have
a voice in this election – and we need your support today to make
sure that they are not silenced. Friend, donate now if you are with
us—help us protect the right to vote, and defend all our
freedoms. We can win key battles in these remaining weeks with you by
our side. Right now, we are:
"Opposing laws in over a dozen states
that place barriers in the way of voters—largely people of color,
students, and the poor. Fighting in states where feckless officials are
attempting to circumvent our voting rights wins, like in Wisconsin, where
free voter IDs are not being issued to voters despite orders by a federal
judge. Ensuring voters don’t face harassment and intimidation from
self-appointed “poll watchers” who may act outside of the
law."
The lamestream media has told you: The
lamestream media has told you:
There is practically no
evidence of voter fraud. It's a myth myth myth.
The
Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that:
Republicans struggle to keep ineligible voters
out of the polls, and ineligible votes from being cast, two issues that
don't concern democrats too greatly, if actions mean
anything.
Just Google "vote fraud" for more evidence than you ever
needed to see. In Chicago, the dead vote. Felony criminals in prison manage
to vote. Illegal aliens register and vote by the thousands, in person and
absentee, with help from democrat activists. In California, driver
licenses, the main ID used to register voters, are being issued without
controls to illegal aliens by the hundreds of thousands -- more than half
of all in 2015 went to illegals, 605,000. Eleven other states do the same.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/10/almost-half-of-california-drivers-licenses-went-to-illegal-immigrants-in-2015/
Efforts
to bring illegals into the country are tied directly to voter registration
efforts. So-called refugees from "majority-muslim" nations are on the
planning charts for importation to America from the democrats. Only fools
believe no one has looked into how they will vote when they arrive, who
will register them, who will advertise to and influence their votes, who
will go through their neighborhoods and "educate" them about how they got
here and how they can advance their "free" benefits by
voting.
Yes, both sides want to influence the vote. One side, the
right, wants to keep the vote American. The lamestream media calls this
"suppressing the vote." They kill us words. (The Politically Corrected
Glossary, https://www.gunlaws.com/politicallycorrect.htm)
The other side, the left, is seeking to destroy American values and have
people lacking in understanding, legitimacy and interest in The
American Way, to permanently despoil what we have here on a permanent
basis. That's called "corrupting the vote" but the right doesn't control
the dialog.
VOTE
FRAUD
Some actual cases
described: http://dailysignal.com/2016/08/18/voter-fraud-is-real-here-are-4-more-cases/
New
York Times: 2,068 cases of fraud nationwide since
2000 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/us/voter-id-laws-donald-trump.html?_r=0
You'll
find pages and pages for you to review on any web
search.
Observation: None of the reported fraud numbers
match. Observation: Democrats are convinced fraud is a "myth" (their
word, appears everywhere). Observation: Republicans are convinced fraud
is rampant and their evidence is debunked vehemently.
The
Uninvited Ombudsman asks:
If you don't require identification to vote, ineligible people
could vote, or people could vote more than once. Does this
matter?
I've asked the right. They say yes, ID must be required to
vote. Only eligible American citizens can vote.
I've asked the
left. They have a litany of why people could legitimately not have ID,
and should be able to vote anyway. Eligibility must not interfere or
cause disenfranchisement.
And now you know.
Get a
good book on how politics really works and our brilliant
American system to better educate yourself and those around
you:
Sovereign
Duty
By KrisAnne Hall, 200 p. #SD $15
Among the most moving patriotic speakers you’ll
ever hear—Hall rekindles your awareness of how America began,
reminding
you of your sovereign duty as a citizen, where real solutions to our
problems reside. Energized by the Founders’ brilliant plans, which
have
been all but lost in the schools, media and culture, this wealth of
history and forgotten values is a
rebirth.
CONFRONTATIONAL
POLITICS
Senator H.L. Richardson, Ret., 136 pgs.,
$12.95
Some of the BS that goes on in Congress and government
seems unexplainable, but it really isn't.
"Politics
works, just not the way you think it does."
Senator
Richardson, a 22-year veteran of the process, lays
out in
naked terms what really goes on, and you'll grasp the
truth
right away. His insider view of the dynamics clears
away
the fog and mystery–politics is predictable,
understandable
and follows simple rules and patterns you can
manipulate.
Politicians are "Pavlovian dogs" who respond
to basic stimuli of pleasure and pain, and will
respond
to you if you understand their motivations. This is
one
of those rare books that is all meat–I
underlined nearly
everything–a brilliant piece of writing that
will forever
remove your blinders, it provides keen insight
into how
the system really really works.
GETTING
TO YES
Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Roger Fisher and William Ury, 200 pgs.,
$15.00
Based on the Harvard Negotiation Project, these
groundbreaking
principles are the heart of the most productive
negotiation
techniques, and will make you more effective with
anti-rights
zealots, legislators, bureaucrats -- even your
boss, your spouse and store clerks. Tells you how to:
Separate
the people from the problem; Focus on interests, not
positions;
Negotiate successfully with people who are more
powerful,
refuse to play by the rules, or resort to dirty
tricks.
Universally applicable methods for negotiating
personal
and professional disputes without getting taken or
angry.
"This is by far the best thing I've ever read on
negotiation." —John Kenneth
Galbraith
IT
WORKS
Anonymous, 28 pgs., $3.00
This remarkable little booklet, written during the
Great
Depression and still popular today, describes an
astonishingly
simple plan for getting what you want in life. (Basic
precept:
"If you know what you want you can have it.")
They key is truly knowing what you want, and this
simple
method helps you crystallize your core goals easily.
If
your true desires are even a little fuzzy, your
success
is compromised from the get go. I can personally
attest
to its value–these principles have guided
much of
the success I have experienced as a writer and
publisher.
Increase your effectiveness in politics–or
improve
any other area of your life–throw this
little gem in
with your order for only a couple of
bucks.
:::-—-:::
5- Growth in Arizona Gun
Law
You've
heard the speculation and nonsense.
Here's the
math:
These are the word counts for the law
section, Appendix D, of this and previous editions of The Arizona Gun
Owner's Guide. The increases are caused by two factors—the discovery
and inclusion of new sections of gun law (e.g., security guards, game and
fish department, military affairs and emergency management, etc.), and the
enactment of new laws by the state legislature, which has been occurring
every year in recent times. Reductions, through amendments and repeals,
also occur, but the net difference has been an increase since we began
doing tracking. Gun laws are growing nationally, with no end in sight. Our
gun laws here have tripled in 20 years. Politicians who claim they
can’t pass more gun laws are either ignorant or deceptive, which is
worse.
"It doesn't make sense to own a gun and not know the
rules."
PreFense The 90% Advantage By Steve Tarani, 288 p. #PF $24.95
The best gunfight is the one you avoid. With a
stellar resume in defense, law enforcement and covert intelligence work,
speaker and educator Tarani opens your thinking about awareness and the
kind of prep that keeps you safe and miles away from needing to draw
your gun. See incidents coming like the pros do and avoid them entirely
instead of reacting—which is halfway to defeat.
Winning a gunfight is heroic, totally macho, creates
stories to tell for a lifetime, and can basically ruin the wonderful life
you are living now. You'll almost certainly face years of courts,
astronomical expense, wary looks from your neighbors, it will affect your
career, relatives, friends, there is no way to express how much better you
will be if you can follow the
golden rule: It's always better to avoid a gunfight than to win
one. That's what this book is all about. Be fully not partially
prepared.
P.S.
SAVE THE DATE: The Crossroads of the West gun show Super-sized Christmas
show, Dec. 2 - 4, 2016, I'll have a whole spread of our fascinating new
products, latest editions of our gun law books, autographing and speaking
with friends and fans... possibly dangerous times ahead (and we'll know who
the president will be!!).
:::-—-:::
6- For Arizona Voters
The lamestream media told you: The
lamestream media told you:
Nothing
reliable.
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however
that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
Korwin's Analysis:
2016 Arizona Ballot
Propositions
...and VOTING EARLY -- BAD BAD
BAD.
Most folks know by now I
don't endorse or oppose candidates -- no way to predict their behavior
once
elected, experience shows their promises are empty, unenforceable,
virtually
worthless. You decide who gets your vote.
Ballot props on the other
hand can be evaluated, and since I vote, I can share results of my own
evaluations.
Arizona has two this year. First: Do NOT vote early, so your vote absolutely
counts, as planned.
You should rise up as a
nation as one,
on one day, and choose our next elected leaders. It makes us a political
unit,
cohesive -- from many, one: E pluribus unum. This is important, it's
the
plan, it's a good plan.
Dissolving the election
out over a
month or more is practically a plot, wiping out the original inspired
plan.
Between the BOGUS EARLY DATE and the REAL CONSTITUTIONAL
ELECTION
DATE:
candidates die
or worse,
they are
arrested,
they withdraw,
you learn they are lowdown
bottom
feeding maggots,
worse than you
dreamed,
Wikileaks spills
dirt,
the media
spins,
phony "polls"
mislead,
advertising
lies,
money
promotes,
and worse.
Your vote gets
wasted
bent, misled, and
worst:
cast at the wrong
time.
Recently hundreds of
thousands of
people early voted for Canadian-Cuban-American Ted Cruz who was on ballots
but
no longer running. Wasted votes. Cuban-American Marco Rubio too. They
wasted their votes. You
know who you are. But it gets worse.
The frenzied breathless
live tallies
election night only count real votes. Early votes -- huh,
maybe
sometimes somewhere, it was unclear at press time -- sit in envelope boxes
to
get opened and counted later -- only if the election is close enough
statistically to matter. Is that what you want? What's election day
for?
Yeah, I know the
arguments. Early
voting is so convenient! Voting is not about convenience, it's about
running
America.
I don't want to miss
voting! You don't
miss an airplane, don't miss the vote. I have to tell you this?
I may be out of town and
need an
absentee ballot! Did I say anything about legit absentees?
Sheesh.
But again, the main thing
is the spirit
of the thing. Rise up with your neighbors and select your leaders on the
same
day. Don't spread it out over an arduous month so the election is an
afterthought ("47% have voted already in Floridistan! It's over with only
two weeks to go... said the announcer for Rock 99 FM"). I heard CNN say
practically that. If the choice is made before election day -- that
virtually
is a plot. I thought the commies were dead. (Hint: they are very
much alive and active.) Sure, I wish we had better choices than we do. I
always do.
And I admit to having no solution to that conundrum.
STATEWIDE ARIZONA
PROPOSITIONS
Prior state elections posed
complicated, numerous and confusing ballot propositions, and I was glad to
provide plain-English descriptions of the bureaucratic bafflegab we
faced.
This year we have two
statewide propositions, and the choices are EASY, depending on where you
stand
on issues, because the propositions are clear.
Arizona Statewide Proposition
205
"Regulation and
Taxation of Marijuana Act"
If you like pot and you say
damn the torpedoes full speed ahead you'll vote yes. If you believe
marijuana
is the scourge of society and the end of our civilization you must vote no.
I'm
not taking a position publicly, and of course, voting is secret in America,
a priceless
value the left and the right has virtually forgotten, eh?
Unfortunately for the
right, there is no constitutional authority to regulate vegetables, so the
feds
have no legitimate role here, the states though do under the 10th
Amendment,
and so the people's will should control.
For libertarians and
theoretically republicans, it's a nightmare, since it introduces
astounding
levels of government regulation, taxation, cartels, a new police force,
registration and record keeping, taxation and bureaucracy. For
recreation.
On the other hand, it does
eliminate an entire level of criminalization, for possession of up to one
ounce
of pot, a holy grail of millions of people who just want to be left alone.
The
effect on schools, road safety, public funding, addictive problems,
employment, entrepreneurship,
artistry and other societal functions are hotly disputed.
A YES vote introduces a 14-page
complex private/government-run cartel monopoly system for removing
marijuana, derivatives and
gear from most state criminal penalties, taxing the goods and allowing its
private use
by most adults in the state. The state government medical-marijuana
supply-chain cartel would establish the system. Federal bans and crimes
remain but are
unenforced by Obamic decree.
A NO vote leaves the
current system in place, with the main suppliers being illicit foreign and
domestic cartels, and the state government medical-marijuana supply-chain
cartel, plus the expensive partners, the U.S. drug agencies with whom the
cartels battle non-stop forever. The supply of drugs is
unaffected.
If you want the criminality
dropped at all costs you'll vote yes, even against libertarian principles
and
introduce massive growth in government and taxation -- agencies,
departments,
regulators, inspectors, its own police forces, accountants, databases,
office
space, jazzy official logos and advertising... The Arizona cartel gives you
bar codes and ads, the
Mexican cartel gives you baggies.
Both systems force
astronomically high prices for a simple vegetable product, as The
Cartridge Family band
song lyric points out: "Drugs are our chief export, U.S. laws give us
price support, Hallelujah!" (To the tune of Michael Row Your Boat
Ashore)
Because this is a
proposition, any changes or adjustments that may be needed after passage,
which
are typical, will need supermajority legislative votes (75%), so fixes will
be
real tough.
Statewide Proposition 206
"The Fair Wages and
Healthy Families Act"
This comes down to whether
you believe a business owner owns a business or the government owns a
business.
If you own your own business, then you get to set the wages. Vote NO on
government mandated wage levels.
If you believe government
has legitimate power to make things "fair," or to set prices where it
believes a market should be set, vote YES to force business owners to pay
their
employees (prices would rise to $12 per hour in 2020).
A YES vote will require
employers of certain private businesses to pay employees a minimum wage
that
rises in four steps until 2020 to $12 per hour. A NO vote leaves the market
as it is now.
The bill also requires 40 hours annual
“earned paid sick time” for employees of large employers
(24 hours for those of small employers); time accrues at one hour
earned for every 30 hours worked, with conditions and other time off
benefits.
NOTE: The proposal includes
some coercion from the unions. Employees are exempt
if they expressly waive the benefits under "collective bargaining
agreements." In other words, you are encouraged to unionize to get excused
from the requirements. It's dirty pool, just thought
you should know.
:::-—-:::
_______________________________ COMMENTS HELP
KEEP ME GOING
"Fantastic. I wish there
were more writers like you!" Peter B. [Thanks. I wish there were more
hours.]
||||
"Purchased from you vs. Amazon to
help support your work." Wayne E. [I make a living either way, but I do
make extra when you buy direct. What a nice
thought.]
||||
I always thought that the Fox babes
looked like sluts with bleached, starched hair. I'd rather join a
monastery than pork them, as long my fellow monks brewed beer. Stopped
watching Fox News years ago.
Trump, Clinton, et al. are our
inferiors and don't deserve our time or vote.
Empires don't
decline gracefully.
Regards, Craig
C.
||||
Pretty much every male I have ever
known cranes his neck virtually to dislocation when a stunning
well-dressed woman saunters by, all having similar thoughts with their
little head, which is what the woman expects and wants, and which
is what the entire advertising industry is built around, at it's bottom
level, survival of the species, along with most other human
endeavor. All this denial is a sociological phenomenon gone
wild. What about issues relevant to the presidency,
media? Jacob
||||
Recently I read your article
in the Concealed Carry magazine titled “Miranda At 50 - Five Decades
Of Silence Rights" and decided to see what else you'd written and wanted to
get your email alert list for the purpose of keeping myself better informed
of my legal rights. Mark A. [Welcome aboard Mark. I get that a lot. Feels
good. Did you try my White Papers? ] Get my gun-law updates and more
here -- https://www.gunlaws.com/updates.htm
||||
I've
been catching up on old Armed American Radio shows and learned of your
email list from there. That is where I also learned of your After
You Shoot book, great read! Just thought it was time to sign up for the
email list. Coleman
||||
The order department
sends these over from time to time, I appreciate it: Your recent American
Handgunner magazine column -- great job!; Super website, very informative
and interesting; Dillon Blue Press -- Good job!; I have an older edition of
this book. Important to stay
current.
||||
WHY EVERYONE MUST LEARN TO
SHOOT!
The Newest Gran’pa Jack
Co-Written by ALAN KORWIN !
Why Jews
Must Learn To Shoot! Gran'pa Jack #9
Kjartan Arnorsson and Alan Korwin, with the late Ray
Carter
24 pgs., only $3, or 2 for $5, we pay the
postage!
So politically incorrect it could catch fire, the
reasons everyone
should learn how to shoot, with all the villains who want to kill you
and destroy America named. We wake up anyone who doesn't realize the
schools are keeping our kids ignorant, religious leaders are practically
worse, and politicians who should help get you trained instead are
seeking to disarm us. Blacks, Arabs, drug lords, The U.N., muslims,
muggers, thieves, bad cops, we spare no one in a quest to motivate the
naive to action. A thrilling teaching tool, get a few, enjoy it, and
pass them around. You owe it to your family and friends to spread the
word -- encourage learn to shoot!
One copy, $3, free
shipping Two copies, $5, still
free shipping
Get a dozen for $20 bucks and really do some good
with them. (S&H at cost)