Some
recent political promises are infringement, and thus
illegal. Consider running that in your local newsletters and club
publications. Permission
granted.
||||
Click for
eBooks!
https://www.gunlaws.com/books22-ebooks.htm
CONTENTS
1-
Wolf Blitzer's Professional
Demise Recent
Interview Ends All
Doubt 2- "Don't Inspire Evil Initiative"
for Journalists New
support We made our voice heard at national journalism
conference 3- Trump Pfumpfers Through
No-Fly-Fraud
The No-Fly
Scheme Seems Attractive -- But It's Tyranny They didn't get the
memo?
4- U.S. Nukes Stored at Turkey's
Airbase At Risk Official's Lies
Are Blatant, Self Evident As safe as "Blocks of concrete"? C'mon! We'll Never Get
Truth About Foiled Coup
5- Early Voting Is Dangerous "News" Incentives Should Be Warnings
6- To Be Fair Just Let Anyone Vote
7- Take Away
The Bad Guns New York Times assaults good
guns
Sheraton Crescent Hotel,
Dunlap at I-17, Phoenix "Tasteful open carry of holstered firearms
appreciated."
Crossroads of the West Gun Show, Dec.
2-4 Phoenix Fairgrounds -- three days --
Biggest of the year
STARTERS
ATF Launches “Anonymous” Tip App The
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has launched a
new mobile app that enables the anonymous reporting of information
regarding crimes or that could be used to help prevent the commission of
crimes. With the reportit app, available through the App Store or on Google
play, citizens can submit a tip and attach a photo or video. The
information is forwarded to ATF in real time, but should not be used to
report a crime that is currently in process. Submitters will have the
option to provide personal information, but it is not required.
(emphasis added). BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Alan: Is it possible this app
doesn't already know who you are if you use it? Especially considering who
designed it?
Top-notch expert: Oh I'm sure it does. Second
top-notch expert: Recommend you route any tips through Hillary's personal
email server to be safe. Third: Doesn't everyone know the
system has to identify both ends of the address to deliver the
message? Names withheld but it doesn't matter
anymore.
||||
Racism Definitioned How to reply to: "That's
racist." and "You're racist." -- "Define racist." Shuts 'em right up,
they don't know (and typically you're not). After the agonizing silence
(or not), they babble and rave, providing endless easy talking points
and superb counter-punches. Remember: "The person who charges racism
typically is the racist." Also: Noticing social, cultural and actual
differences between races is not racism. It's
normal.
||||
LEGAL REMINDER-- Democrat arguments that America cannot
legally ban immigrants is abject ignorance. If republicans were educated
they would simply cut off the opposition at the knees with
facts:
Federal law: 8 USC
§1182 (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by
President Whenever
the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of
aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of
the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he
shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of
aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens
any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. (Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1952, enacted June 27, 1952, also known as the
McCarran-Walter Act.) INADMISSIBLE ALIENS [List
reduced and abbreviated from 100 pages of statute:] Multiple
health-related grounds like communicable diseases without cure, criminal
grounds, substance traffickers, prostitution and commercial vice,
religiously oppressive government officials as defined, human
traffickers, money launderers, national security grounds, known
terrorists, potential terrorists, people affiliated with terrorism,
totalitarians (aimed at communists), Nazis, participants in genocide,
users of child soldiers, people likely to become a "public charge"
(welfare case), certain job applicants depending on job and other
conditions, certain athletes, unqualified physicians and health-care
workers (quacks), aliens on parole, false claimants of citizenship,
stowaways, smugglers, visa abusers, people without passports, draft
evaders, illegal aliens already here, repeat offenders, practicing
polygamists, child abductors, unlawful voters, renunciants, tax evaders,
other subcategories, exceptions and easy latitude to apply throughout,
this is a partial list, courtesy Alan
Korwin, Author, Gun
Laws of America.
||||
HELPING
REPORTERS DO THEIR JOBS Tired of asking the same tired
questions? Need a good new one for Mr. Hussein-Obama, or Mrs.
Rodham-Clinton? "We understand you're against Mr. Trump's plan to build
a wall to prevent people from illegally entering our nation through our
southern border, yet you support doubling the height, from 7 to 14 feet, of
the wall that keeps people from illegally entering the White House grounds.
What in your opinion is the difference?"
||||
THE LAW OF SELF
DEFENSE The Indispensable Guide for the Armed
Citizen By Attorney Andrew F. Branca 292 pgs. #LOSD
$25
Complete 50-state self-defense guide:
You carry a
gun so you’re hard to kill. Read this book so you’re hard to
convict.
An easy to understand, entertaining and informative manual that covers
self-defense law in all 50 states. Clearly explains not just statutes
but how courts apply them, corrects myths that get people in trouble,
highly praised by many self-defense legends. Includes illuminating,
gut-wrenching, true-life examples. Covers Reasonableness, Innocence,
Imminence, Avoidance, and Proportionality, handling 911 and first
responders, prejudiced witnesses and biased media, your state’s
nuances,
effective legal strategies.
||||
:::-—-:::
1- Wolf Blitzer's Professional Demise Interview Ends All
Doubt
CNN, 9/13/16 -- With a news-like demeanor and a
professional tone, Wolf Blitzer actually asked a sitting U.S. Senator, "So
why is Donald Trump refusing to release his tax returns?"
And with
that seemingly newsworthy inquiry, Blitzer gave up the last shred of
pretense that he is a journalist or reporter, and is merely a political
partisan in tailored suits. The question was a perfect paradigm of the rest
of his broadcast.
That question, which has been posed and
addressed thousands of times literally answers itself. The people
like Blitzer who ache for the information want to find things they can use
to hurt Trump. Trump wants to keep it under wraps to stop them and protect
himself. Everyone knows this implicitly. It's been regurgitated ad
infinitum. Why even ask -- it only shows you're a
partisan.
Trump has replied endlessly (Blitzer of course knows
this) he is waiting for the IRA audit of him to complete. Until then,
the returns are preliminary, and subject to change. That is
so normal, asking the question gets an F in Journalism 101, and a dunce
cap. Two dunce caps to the reporters who want the returns to see what Trump
is worth -- your tax returns don't reveal that. An imbecile who
files returns knows that, a commentary on too many
First-Amendment-protected reporters. After the audit, Trump may stall anew,
everyone knows this too.
What Blitzer should ask a sitting Senator
when he gets one to speak with him, is, for example, what's happening about
the $400 million in cash the terrorists in Iran got in cash from us, that's
now $1.7 billion in foreign currency? Which bank cobbled together that much
dough, in foreign currency? What does "provide material support to
terrorists" mean (18 USC §2339A et seq.)?
Or he
could ask, "Now that so many counties and states have only one health-care
provider going broke and hanging on by a thread under ObamaCare, and
customers everywhere have had price increases, is the system truly on the
verge of collapse?" "Can it be held off until Obama is out of
office?"
Or, what's happening in Chad where terrorist training
camps are set up? What is Canada doing with its tar sands oil while we
stall around? Or, if a person isn't free to fly, why can they drive? (full
story below) How about, How do you justify the Dept. of Education, since
it's not authorized by the Constitution? Or my favorite, especially good
for candidates but good for politicians too, What's the purpose of
government? Need more? Try The Liberty Poll: https://www.gunlaws.com/the%20liberty%20poll.htm
Only
a reporter would be asking such things. We don't seem to have any
left.
:::-—-:::
2- Don't Inspire Evil
Initiative Support Grows, Media Remains
Immune
__________ON LETTERHEAD__________
__________ON
LETTERHEAD__________
Do you belong to a national group that would support this
campaign?
Send me a letter on your letterhead expressing that
support, and I'll make sure it becomes part of the
program.
Hundreds of journalists at the annual Society of
Professional Journalists (spj.org) conference in New Orleans were exposed
to this message in September. So far, there has been no direct feedback or
visible results. Leadership received letters like the ones above, and other
materials, by fax to their hotel, by email, and by telephone, so we know
they got the message.
This program is ongoing. News as it
happens.
:::-—-:::
We have new
books! Click the image and browse a
bit
Come back here
when you're done reading the Page Nine
news!
:::-—-:::
3- Trump Pfumpfers
Through No-Fly-Fraud
The No Fly Scheme Seems Attractive -- But It's
Tyranny
They didn't get the
memo?
The lamestream media told you: The
lamestream media told you:
During the first presidential
debate, Trump, flustered and unprepared, almost said he thinks the
secret-police no-fly list is a good way to deny gun rights. In typical
unfortunate fashion, as the transcript here shows (his thoughts are
disjointed, but you can sort of get his gist from his incomplete sentence
fragments):
“First of all, I agree, and a lot of people even
within my own party want
to give certain rights to people on watch lists and no- fly lists. I
agree with you,” Trump told Hillary*. “When a person is on a
watch list or a no-fly list. I have the endorsement of the NRA, which I'm
very proud of. These are very, very good people, and they're protecting the
Second Amendment.” “But,” he continued, “I think we
have to look very strongly at no-fly lists and watch lists. And when people
are on there, even if they shouldn't be on there, we'll help them, we'll
help them legally, we'll help them get off. But I tend to agree with that
quite strongly.” (Agree with what exactly?)
He later tweets:
"I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing
people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy
guns."
Moments later the NRA responds: Happy to meet
@realdonaldtrump. Our position is no guns for terrorists-period. Due
process & right to self-defense for law-abiding Americans
NRA's
Chris Cox, same day:
“The NRA's position on this issue has
not changed. The NRA believes that terrorists should not be allowed to
purchase or possess firearms, period. Anyone on a terror watch list who
tries to buy a gun should be thoroughly investigated by the FBI and the
sale delayed while the investigation is ongoing. If an investigation
uncovers evidence of terrorist activity or involvement, the government
should be allowed to immediately go to court, block the sale, and arrest
the terrorist.
At the same time, due process protections should be
put in place that allow law-abiding Americans who are wrongly put on a
watch list to be removed. That has been the position of Sen. John Cornyn
(R.-Tex.) and a majority of the U.S. Senate. Sadly, President Obama
and his allies would prefer to play politics with this
issue.”
*In a lengthy anti-gun-rights monologue,
Rodham-Clinton included this: "And we finally need to pass a prohibition on
anyone who’s on the
terrorist watch list from being able to buy a gun in our country. If
you’re too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun." The
no-fly list is a small (70,000) sub-set of the terrorist watch list (about
1 million). "Buy a new gun" and "have lots of guns" are different, one
without the other makes no sense, and journalists, predictably, never ask
about such things.
When the bill gets drafted, typically, it bears
little resemblance to public statements. The current bill is an
uncontrolled grant of power to authorities to regulate
transfer of firearms, under the rubric of a no-fly something or
other:
https://www.gunlaws.com/FlakeAmendmentHR2578.htm "No district court of the United States or court of
appeals of the United States shall have
jurisdiction to consider the lawfulness or
constitutionality of this section..."
The Uninvited
Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that:
Forget what Rodham-Clinton said ("If
you’re too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun.")
--
If you're too dangerous to fly, you're too dangerous to be out
walking around free. Right?
Should some reporter somewhere have
asked her about that? What's wrong with these people? (The reporters, we
know what's wrong with jihadis who should not be out walking
around.) Don't
Airport Checkpoint Scanners Work On These People?
You're not telling us checkpoints are just for show and don't
work, are you?
If people are too dangerous to get on a plane to
Cincinnati,
why can they go there by AmTrak, or Greyhound, or car, or on
foot?
Who are these people? (It's a secret.) Are they even
charged with anything? (No.)
You mean the Constitution has been suspended for American
citizens,
because they're named on a police list -- in secret? A
secret-police list?
Can politicians do that -- and remain in office? Doesn't
that violate the oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution? (It
does.)
Are Americans awake? How can you run for office with that as a
platform?
No-fly no-buy is a subtle but seductive error of logic
-- and violates everything America stands for. For example:
Q:
If you can't buy a gun, what about all the guns you already
have?
Didn't the moderator think about that? Didn't
you? Rodham-Clinton is coming for your
guns.
||||
Cop
Jokes
By Lou Savelli and Stuart Moss 140 p. #CJ
$9.95
Lighten up with the hysterical book by former police
officers who've collected humor for years about their
profession, victims, criminal offenders, the justice system, no one is
immune from
their scathing wit, I laughed out loud a lot. How many cops does it
take
to throw a guy down the stairs? The guy fell.
:::-—-:::
4- U.S.
Nukes Stored at Turkey's Airbase At Risk Official's Lies Are Blatant, Self
Evident
Safe as "Blocks of
concrete"? C'mon!
We'll Never Get Truth About Foiled
Coup
The lamestream media told you: The
lamestream media told you:
[Note:
Turkey, a staunch and formerly stable U.S. ally, has housed U.S. nuclear
weapons for decades. The foiled coup in July raised questions about the
security of those bombs.]
Wesley Clark, the retired 4-star general
who was a NATO supreme allied commander in the 1990s, is quoted by Tribune
News Service (link above) about the dozens of nukes U.S. has stashed in
Turkey: “They are very secure.” He said they could be extracted
quickly if the situation deteriorated, and the electronic locks on the
bombs would render them useless: “If you captured them, it would be
like having a block of concrete.”
The Tribune states that
the B61s are broadly considered more a political symbol of US commitment to
the NATO alliance than a military asset. The US does not have aircraft at
Incirlik airfield qualified to deliver the weapons.
For the
weapons to be used, the US would have to fly a squadron of aircraft into
Incirlik to load the bombs, all of which would be observed by Russia and
possibly make the base a target of a first strike.
The
Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that:
If the airbase in southern Turkey base is
overrun by neighboring Syria, or the Islamic radicals in Syria, both just a
short drive away, or the poorly identified coup rebels already in Turkey,
the scores of nuclear bombs there are anything but secure, this much is
obvious to a retard, a word that politically correct forces threaten us for
using. Clark is not retarded but perhaps thinks we are.
Calling
captured nuclear bombs with trigger locks "blocks of concrete" wouldn't
fool Oliver Wendell Holmes, who recognized a three-tier hierarchy of idiots
-- morons, imbeciles and idiots, from stupid to stupidest. He decided it
was fine to sterilize a woman because she was in category two, an imbecile
(and she wasn't actually but the federal government sterilized her anyway,
thanks to Oliver). But I digress.
A nuclear weapon even without a
trigger, let alone one with a perfect trigger lock (and there is no such
thing, since someone can operate it, right?) is packed solid with
enough unstable nuclear metal to explode -- uranium or plutonium -- just
what jihadis or terrorists want. And it's also got enough hi-tech
hi-explosives to set it off, that's how these things work. A block of
concrete indeed! What sort of blockheads do they think we are? Even
unbathed jihadis in rags can figure this much out. Journalists, reportedly
intelligent, didn't question the general.
As to acting easily and
getting them out quick, and I won't reference Benghazi here, the political
implications of "declaring" the situation so dire, and our most heavily
armed NATO ally unfit to store the things by rashly pulling them out, this
is drastic or we'd have done it long ago, aside from demonstrating how weak
we now are.
And finally, the abject nonsense that we have no
system qualified for delivering a B61 tactical nuke, a design from the
early 1960s and among our oldest, whose yield apparently ranges from 300
tons to 170 kilotons of TNT, c'mon! If the Iranians had one, just for
starters, they could put the fissile material and explosives in a truck
with some guy and a hammer. We delivered in WWII in a propeller
plane.
I just don't see how the "news" could get any
worse.
||||
ETHICS An Early American
Handbook (1890 Reprint!) By Benjamin Comegys 128 p. #ET $7.95
Who can live up to these simple, decent
standards—but
they spell out the America you’d like to see our nation get back to!
This marvelous little book, a reproduction of the original 1890 text
which describes how good people behave, from honesty to industry,
duty
to playmates to “treatment of dumb animals.” May sound
lightweight
today, but only if you've been dumbed down: you’ll instantly
recognize
what America (and you?) have lost and need back. Worth every penny.
:::-—-:::
5- Early Voting Is
Dangerous
"News" Incentives
Should Be Warnings
The lamestream media
told you: The lamestream media told you:
Be sure to
register for early voting. Your vote counts.
The
Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that:
Do NOT vote early.
It helps guarantee
your vote will NOT count.
The nation is supposed to rise up as
one, on a single day, and choose our next elected leaders. It makes us a
political unit, cohesive, from many, one. E pluribus unum. This is
important.
Spreading
the election over a month or more is practically a plot. It wipes out the
original inspired plan. Between the bogus early date and the
real constitutional election date, candidates die, get murdered,
they are arrested, they withdraw, you learn they are lowdown sly lying
sidewinding snakes worse than you knew, and worse. Your vote gets
wasted.
In the recent primaries hundreds of thousands of people
early voted for Canadian-Cuban-American Ted Cruz who was on the ballot but
no longer running. The same for Cuban-American Marco Rubio. They wasted
their votes. You know who you are. But it gets worse.
The live
tallies election night count real votes. Early votes sit in
envelope boxes to get opened and counted later -- only if the election is
close enough statistically to matter. Is that what you want?
Yeah,
I know the arguments. Early voting is so convenient! Voting is not about
convenience, it's about running America. I don't want to miss voting! You
don't miss an airplane, don't miss the vote. I have to tell you this? I may
be out of town and need an absentee ballot! Did I say anything about legit
absentees? Sheesh.
But again, the main thing is the spirit of the
thing. Rise up with your neighbors and select your leaders on the same day.
Don't spread it out over an arduous month so the election becomes an
afterthought. So the choice is made before election day -- that
practically is a plot. Sure, I wish we had better choices than
we do. I always do. And I admit to having no solution to that
conundrum.
The lamestream
media told you: The lamestream media told you:
Democrats
object strongly to the need for Photo ID at the polls. The ACLU has filed
numerous lawsuits to stop the evil controversial practice aimed at
suppressing the vote by evil republicans.
The
Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that:
Why is it unreasonable to expect people to
provide government proof of who they are before voting in a government
election?
Put another way, why would you want a person who can't
get a job, or unemployment, open a bank account, rent an apartment, or a
hotel room, buy a home, get a mortgage, buy a gun, go to college, get on an
airplane, visit a doctor, get government aid, buy a cell phone or drive a
car... to vote? Who are these people?
Followup question: Should
our elections be limited to only citizens eligible to vote? Is it OK for
people who are foreigners or otherwise ineligible to vote in our election,
to vote?
||||
PreFense The 90% Advantage By Steve Tarani, 288 p. #PF $24.95
The best gunfight is the one you avoid. With a
stellar resume in defense, law enforcement and covert intelligence work,
speaker and educator Tarani opens your thinking about awareness and the
kind of prep that keeps you safe and miles away from needing to draw
your gun. See incidents coming like the pros do and avoid them entirely
instead of reacting—which is halfway to defeat.
Winning a gunfight is heroic, totally macho, creates
stories to tell for a lifetime, and can basically ruin the wonderful life
you are living now. You'll almost certainly face years of courts,
astronomical expense, wary looks from your neighbors, it will affect your
career, relatives, friends, there is no way to express how much better you
will be if you can follow the
golden rule: It's always better to avoid a gunfight than to win
one. That's what this book is all about. Be fully not partially
prepared.
New York Times assaults the best guns, the ones the public
wants
The gloves are off, no more
weasel words, confiscation on page one
The lamestream media
told you: The lamestream media told you:
OMG, The New
York Times ran an editorial on Page One! Pundits go wild! The first
time since 1920, so it must be critically important! (Readers of The
New York Times of course know a good percentage of everything in
that paper is editorial, and it is not right-of-center, it is
hopelessly biased to the left.) This one demands gun confiscation. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-america.html
The
Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that: The Uninvited Ombudsman notes
however that:
For years the gun-owning public has known left-wing
radicals like the people at The New York Times and their followers
want to outlaw guns and confiscate them from the public.
The left
wing, in typical totalitarian fashion, has denied it, lying to our faces.
They've decided to stop lying, though we've outed them in the past. Now
it's a big deal the The Times said it in an editorial on their front
page, as if this is more meaningful than all the other covert and overt
threats we have endured, and stories they have run. They
said:
"Certain kinds
of weapons... and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for
civilian ownership."
It's time to, "require Americans who own
those kinds
of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow
citizens."
Just wait until you see the bills they draft
to do this.
Among the most moving patriotic speakers
you’ll
ever hear—Hall rekindles your awareness of how America began,
reminding
you of your sovereign duty as a citizen, where real solutions to our
problems reside. Energized by the Founders’ brilliant plans, which
have
been all but lost in the schools, media and culture, this wealth of
history and forgotten values is a rebirth.
:::-—-:::
P.S.
SAVE THE DATE: The Crossroads of the West gun show Super-sized Christmas
show, Dec. 2 - 4, 2016, I'll have a whole spread of our fascinating new
products, latest editions of our gun law books, autographing and speaking
with friends and fans... possibly dangerous times ahead (and we'll know who
the president will be!!).
_______________________________ COMMENTS HELP KEEP ME
GOING
Your article about "guns on the street" was
great!
I have always thought about that and I have another one you probably have
thought about: the anti-gun people have an expression that irritates me no
end. That is THERE ARE (HOWEVER MANY) MILLION GUNS IN CIRCULATION.
What do they mean by CIRCULATION? It's like all the guns are
continually flowing from one hand to another and they don't stay with any
one person very long. I propose that the vast majority of guns are
NEVER traded or "circulated" since they are purchased! D.S. [Just
another hoplophobic
terror these people are burdened with D.S.; to them, guns are floating
around in some ether poised to do harm. These folks need treatment but
never get any. In the first debate, Rodham-Clinton said, "We’ve got
too many military-style weapons on the streets." Guns are in people's
homes, as we all know, and "military-style" is just
prejudice.
||||
Another great article, Alan. Not
only are you a very good writer, but you have a good sense and "eye" or
feel for the reality of the situation and go straight to the point.
Thanks for all that you do! William J.S.
||||
Hi
Alan, Just finishing “After
you Shoot”. Hopefully I never have to find out what is involved
“first hand". Very good reading. Glad you include everyone's point of
view. Thank you, Pat
||||
WHY
EVERYONE MUST LEARN TO SHOOT!
The Newest Gran’pa Jack
Co-Written by ALAN KORWIN !
Why Jews
Must Learn To Shoot! Gran'pa Jack #9
Kjartan Arnorsson and Alan Korwin, with the late Ray
Carter
24 pgs., only $3, or 2 for $5, we pay the
postage!
So politically incorrect it could catch fire, the
reasons everyone
should learn how to shoot, with all the villains who want to kill you
and destroy America named. We wake up anyone who doesn't realize the
schools are keeping our kids ignorant, religious leaders are practically
worse, and politicians who should help get you trained instead are
seeking to disarm us. Blacks, Arabs, drug lords, The U.N., muslims,
muggers, thieves, bad cops, we spare no one in a quest to motivate the
naive to action. A thrilling teaching tool, get a few, enjoy it, and
pass them around. You owe it to your family and friends to spread the
word -- encourage learn to shoot!
One copy, $3, free
shipping Two copies, $5, still
free shipping
Get a dozen for $20 bucks and really do some good
with them. (S&H at cost)