Click for eBooks!   You CAN take it with you!

====


Angela Merkel, the German Prime Minister has offered to finance refugee camps for muslim refugees in muslim countries, living up to the humanitarian ideals of western civilizations. Muslim countries are refusing the offer, and refusing to accept muslim refugees on their own. Go figure.


====


The United States should live up to (theoretical) obligations of humanitarian civilizations and offer to contribute to building refugee camps in muslim nations, to help muslim refugees forced out of muslim nations by muslims attempting to kill fellow muslims, but the man currently in the White House has refused to do so, so far. Go figure.


====


For a report on what's actually happening with muslim refugees invading Europe, completely missing from your nightly news reports, see my brief recap, later in this report, from a friend just returning from four months in Europe. It's not pretty. And it's not mostly families as you've may have been led to believe.  Go figure.


"Mostly women and children..."


====


Counterintuitive Man Notes That:

Obama's new gun control force is eight times the size of the Pentagon's ISIS commando team.
What's wrong with that picture?
Washington Examiner, (1/5/16)


====



We carry several of his excellent books -- Browse: https://www.gunlaws.com


====








1- Obama Announces No-Buy List for Guns

Seeks to change arbitrary "No-Fly List" into "No Buy List"

WHY THE NO-FLY LIE MUST DIE

Don't TSA Scanners Work on These People?


If you can't buy guns, you sure can't own guns


Democrats cheer wildly at announcement



by Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman
Click it: GunLaws.com


The man in the White House has publicly announced his intention to summarily disarm the public based on a swiftly growing secret police list.

“Right now, people on the no-fly list can walk into a store and buy a gun. That is insane. If you're too dangerous to board a plane, you're too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun.”

That's a direct quote from Barack Hussein Obama.

Are those people charged with something? Have they been convicted of anything? That's rhetorical. No to both questions. I asked the FBI at the SHOT Show in Jan., 2016. They are just banned from flying. Why? The FBI won't say. It's a secret. How do you get on the list? I found out that's a secret too. You lose your right to fly by secret. The list is kept secret by police. Secret police list. Those are words we're not supposed to connect in this free country.

People on this secret police list can still take Amtrak, or a bus, or drive to Cincinnati. Or anywhere. If those people are that dangerous why are they still walking around? I asked the FBI. No answer. What sense does that make? Who are these people? That's a secret too. Maybe they can down a plane with a karate chop.

Some things about this no-fly list just don't fly --

Does it mean the scanners and screening at TSA airport checkpoints don't work on those people? That's why we need the list? Those folks could board with guns and knives and bombs if we didn't ban them -- with a list? The X-ray machines, wands, bomb swabs, anal probes and magnetometers work for the rest of us, but not on them? Does that make sense to you? Maybe checkpoints are just a feel-good scam to keep us in line like the skeptics say.

Well it's not a secret to (name withheld to protect the innocent). I met her at a trade show in the press office. Her toddler daughter got a flight ticket with her, but when they got to the gate, they found out her daughter's on the list, and couldn't board. Just like Senator Ted Kennedy. It turns out loads of ordinary people are on the list. The ACLU is fighting the whole concept, for a whole lot of good reasons. But not for the best reason.

“That is insane.”

During his recent gun-control TV town hall, this man who took an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” our Constitution repeated this twisted logic, and wild cheers erupted from the democrat-packed audience. It makes sense, it has a certain appeal, if you don't look at it too hard like we're doing -- or if you're brain dead. If you really want guns to “just go away” this would work -- until you realize it leaves guns in the hands of the agents running the list.

An arbitrary list, with no checks and balances, no functional controls or due process of any kind, will deny our fundamental constitutional civil and human rights. The man currently in the White House is calling for the list. You're insane if you object, he says.

By implication, if you can't buy a gun, you certainly aren't free to possess any of the firearms you already own, right? Someone should come and take all those dangerous guns away from you because they must be contraband. You're too dangerous to own them. How do you get off the list? You have to sue the federal government.

Mr. Obama wants to turn an arbitrary no-fly list run by the government without rules into an arbitrary no-buy list for your fundamental right to keep and bear arms. The gloves are off, the cat is out of the bag, the lie is bald-faced. There are no known parameters for adding people to the list. The Terrorist Screening Center, a secretive FBI branch you can't deal with, runs it.

It was started by George W. Bush after the muslim jihad struck our World Trade Towers in 2001, with about 400 names. Under Obama, the list grew to 10,000 names in 2011, 21,000 in 2012, and 47,000 in 2013, according to Wikipedia. The separate Terrorism Watch List reportedly had more than one million names by 2009 -- and the lists are mutually exclusive, you can be on one and not the other.

This has all the earmarks of a colored-shirt operation we witnessed in Europe that led to World War II.

Half the country, give or take, votes democrat, who cheers the plan. For shame. Hussein-Obama's proposal is a disgrace, a violation of his oath, grounds for removal from office, according to leading experts.

The “news” media remained largely -- and ominously -- silent at the announcement. Are they afraid they might end up on the list? Did they spot any of the obvious contradictions even within the announcement? It would be easy to dismiss their inability to understand the constitutional problems. They perpetually demonstrate they are unschooled in its workings, as they run hither and yon cheering for candidates instead of reporting about them, supporting socialism instead of The American Way, https://www.gunlaws.com/TheAmericanWay.htm arguing for the rule of no law, and now this.

If you like your guns we can take your guns, by putting you on a list. Anyone who objects is by definition insane. Have a nice day.









The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

Barack Hussein Obama has decided to skip the funeral of recently deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, whose dedication to the Constitution and the rule of law does not closely match Mr. Hussein-Obama's, according to leading experts.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

The District of Columbia vs. Heller case, considered by the firearms community to be among Justice Scalia's finest pieces of work, is being made available in annotated form and on special terms by Bloomfield Press, the nation's largest publisher and distributor of gun law books.

The book's co-author Alan Korwin was invited by the High Court to observe oral argument in the case. He attended with his Cartridge Family Band https://www.gunlaws.com/CFB-BandInfo.htm fellow musician Bob Blackmer (who had originally planted the idea of going); Bob had to wait outside overnight in freezing conditions to obtain a seat. Korwin reported directly from Washington D.C. on the landmark event and was joined by dozens of luminaries in attendance, including his co-author, David Kopel (who sat at the Respondent's table up front). Read about the court time itself: https://www.gunlaws.com/SCGC-Heller2-PostGameReport.htm

The book, The Heller Case, Gun Rights Affirmed! here: https://www.gunlaws.com/hc.htm became an instant classic, spelling out in plain English what SCOTUS Justice Scalia had written in crisp, compelling legalese, having been assigned the case by Chief Justice John Roberts. It confirmed that the Second Amendment is an individual right of American people, despite fabrications and concoctions invented by leftists to deny the right people had exercised for more than 200 years. The opposition claimed the right was "collective," and belonged to no person in particular, a false perspective expressed in the dissent, which the book includes.

In addition to every word of both the decision ("the holding") and the dissents, the book highlights hundreds of important quotations in the texts and features plain English summaries of every aspect of the case, plus explanations of how the case came to be, who the various players are, and how the Court works. "News" media typically exhibit an abysmally low understanding of such things, misleading the public, you included, unfortunately.

The Heller Case, Gun Rights Affirmed!,  https://www.gunlaws.com/hc.htm also includes three other Supreme Court important gun cases that were decided before the Heller case, but after Supreme Court Gun Cases, the unabridged guide to the Court's 92 prior gun cases Supreme Court Gun Cases https://www.gunlaws.com/supreme.htm. Journalists constantly and inaccurately say the Court has been largely quiet about guns but that is totally false -- they have used some form of the word firearm more than 2,900 times in those decisions, consistently recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms.

This is reflected in the fact that in America we have gun stores, we have always had gun stores, and you don't need to join a state militia to walk in and buy as many firearms and as much ammunition as you like.


The Heller Case, Gun Rights Affirmed! is a joy to read and a tribute to the memory of one of the finest legal minds to ever grace the Supreme Court bench. If you have never actually read a High Court decision, this is the place to start. It is an education, an exhilaration and rollicking good fun all at the same time.














Political correctness has leaked its way into our schools, media, culture and thoughts -- sometimes unconsciously, sometimes deliberately, by people seeking to undermine our freedom and undo the advances we the people have achieved, replacing liberty with tyrannical control over the populace.

Unable to defeat us with military might, our enemies are having great success undermining our values using mere language. As George Orwell so keenly observed, control the language and you control thought. Control thought and you control everything else. It's time to re-read the book 1984, or read it for the first time if you haven't already.

It's time to start recognizing the corrupt use of the invented term "gun violence" in place of the correct word, "crime." The next time you see the propaganda term, in your mind, read "crime" and watch the spin change. Mr. Hussein-Obama admitted on TV recently that fully two-thirds of firearms mortality is suicide, a medical issue, and neither gun violence nor crime. War deaths in the government sponsored war on some drugs can be avoided by declaring a truce, which government refuses to even consider. By falsely labeling these "gun violence" they build shallow political capital to attack our rights, a despicable abuse of power.

The 30,000 figure constantly cited would drop to 4,000 with those changes alone, and re-frame the entire debate. The "news" media loves the distorted propaganda phrases that assault our rights. Don't help them. The Politically Corrected Glossary, https://www.gunlaws.com/politicallycorrect.htm. Take a quick peek.













4- "Smart Guns" vs. Smarter Guns



The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/more-half-handgun-buyers-would-consider-smart-guns-study-n501321

[NOTE: This story, its source, and its stats left me stunned; the "news" has deteriorated completely.]

Deven Coldewey (NBC News) -- "Many Americans would consider 'smart' or childproof weapons if they were to buy a new gun, a new study by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health finds.

"Fifty-nine percent of respondents to the Web-based survey of nearly 4,000 people indicated interest in the tech-infused guns, which use fingerprint detection or wireless signals to limit use of the weapon to its owner.

"Non-owners of guns and people identifying as 'liberal' were most likely to consider buying smart guns, while owners of multiple guns were least likely. [no stats provided]

"A 2013 study funded by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun makers trade association, showed only 14 percent of people would consider smart guns.

"President Barack Obama recently announced, during an emotional speech about gun violence, that his administration would pursue smart gun technology.

"'If we can set it up so you can't unlock your phone unless you've got the right fingerprint,' he said, 'why can't we do the same thing for our guns?'"

Note: NBC has been ranked by media watchdog groups as the least neutral and most hostile to gun rights of all national broadcast news outlets, but the others are very close. The term "gun violence" is a recently introduced and now common pejorative media propaganda phrase substituting for the word "crime." No balancing to this Bloomberg-funded story was provided, beyond the one line about the NSSF study that contradicts the whole thing.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

So-called "smart guns" is a new rallying cry of the left, in their never ending drive to disarm or subarm the public. The effort is based, at its core, in unmitigated fear of firearms, ignorance of how firearms work, and an insecurity by its advocates about their own capacity for safely handling and using firearms, which does not afflict members of the gun community. The anti-gun sufferers do not seek treatment for their condition, preferring to disable others as a solution instead.

Their quest for so-called "smart" guns is for guns that don't work under multiple conditions. These are typically battery powered, which as anyone with an Obama phone or cash-for-clunker car knows, go dead at the worse possible times. Dead is the perfect word.

They can only be operated by one person, or only with an external device handy, all dangerous conditions for a device that must work without fail as if your life depends on it, because it does.

Guns aren't "smart" and cannot be. They are inanimate objects only as smart as their users, a point practically lost on the people promoting so-called "smart" gun schemes, in an effort to disarm or subarm gun owners. An underlying principle of proposed "smart guns" is remote control, allowing owners (but actually "officially authorized users") to make sure the gun cannot fire unless an "authorized user" deems that necessary. If "authorized user" sounds a little bureaucratic, that's because it is.

Smarter Guns

Smarter guns is what the gun industry and gun owners continuously demand and develop. Aside from evolving from smooth-bore matchlocks to self-loading rifled-barrel cartridge arms -- each step has involved exceedingly smarter designs. Modern guns have gotten smarter, for example with sights.

This includes an ongoing graduation from traditional centuries old (yet still fully functional) open iron sights to improvements like telescopic, improved reticle, three dot, phosphors, optical fiber, radioisotope light emitting, 3D red dot, laser projecting, range finding and more.

Guns so equipped are smarter, better, improved, but by no means "smart" in the left-wing sense of inoperable -- the hypothetical golden fleece anti gunners and hoplophobes seek to protect themselves -- not from crime, but from guns themselves. They don't seek protection from what guns are designed to protect us from, but from the guns. Hence their solutions are mythological, and typically dangerous or imaginary, which leads to the staunch resistance they constantly face, which they find mystifying and unfathomable. None are so blind as those who cannot see.









Texas Open Carry Bill HB 910
Effective January 1, 2016

Texas Open Carry Overview

After 20 years (1995-2015) the familiar Texas Concealed Handgun License (CHL) officially changes to a Texas License To Carry or LTC -- because it now protects both discreet and open carry of sidearms.

The entire update for Texas is here:
https://www.gunlaws.com/tgogup.htm






Look at the updates to the Texas gun laws for the last 15 years right here:
https://www.gunlaws.com/updates.htm

Get my 12th book, After You Shoot: Your gun's hot. The perp's not. Now what? https://www.gunlaws.com/AYS.htm, virtually as important, so you don't end up in more trouble than the crook.

Just go to GunLaws.com and sign up on the home page.



----:::----